City
Epaper

SC says any attempt of bogus voting, booth capturing should be dealt with iron hands

By ANI | Published: July 23, 2021 10:14 PM

The Supreme Court on Friday said that any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands as it ultimately affects the rule of law and democracy.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday said that any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands as it ultimately affects the rule of law and democracy.

A bench of Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice MR Shah, referring to its earlier verdicts, said that the freedom to vote is a part of the freedom of expression and the secrecy of the vote is necessary for strengthening democracy.

The apex court said the essence of the electoral system should be to ensure freedom to voters to exercise their free choice.

The court dismissed an appeal by a man convicted for rioting at a poll booth in Jharkhand.

"The essence of the electoral system should be to ensure freedom of voters to exercise their free choice. Therefore, any attempt of booth capturing or bogus voting should be dealt with iron hands because it ultimately affects rule of law and democracy," the court said.

It said in elections to the Lok Sabha and state legislatures maintenance of secrecy is a must.

It added that in democracies where direct elections take place it is important to ensure that voter casts his vote without fear.

"Democracy and free elections are part of the basic structure of the Constitution. An election is a mechanism that ultimately represents the will of the people. Nobody can be permitted to dilute the right to free and fair elections," the Bench said referring its earlier verdict.

The accused in the case had allegedly formed an unlawful assembly "to snatch the voters' list and to cast bogus voting" and attacked some political workers during an election. The apex court said the use of force even by one member of the assembly amounts to rioting.

Accused Lakshman Singh had filed an appeal in the top court challenging the High Court order that confirmed the trial court's six-month punishment to him under sections 323 (voluntary causing hurt) and 147 (rioting) of the Indian Penal Code.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: High CourtMr ShahSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudHong kong high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

National Realted Stories

NationalTelangana Horror: Buried Newborn Girl Found Alive in Hanamkonda; Watch Video

NationalSC to deliver verdict on Monday on pleas of unsuccessful candidates in Bihat District Judges exam

NationalCong leader Alka Lamba seeks PM's intervention to bring Prajwal Revanna back to India

NationalRahul dares PM Modi to promise removal of 50 pc quota limit, says 'Cong will do if voted to power'

NationalBJP forms legal cell in Bengal to help genuine candidates among 25,753 job losers