City
Epaper

SC sets aside Bombay HC's order, upholds Maharashtra govt's decision to attach properties of 63 Moons Technologies

By ANI | Updated: April 22, 2022 15:53 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday set aside the Bombay High Court order and upheld the decision of the Maharashtra government to attach properties of company 63 Moons Technologies.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday set aside the Bombay High Court order and upheld the decision of the Maharashtra government to attach properties of company 63 Moons Technologies.

A detailed order is awaited.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud set aside the Bombay High Court order, which quashed the notifications issued by the state government for attaching movable and immovable properties of 63 moons under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID).

The Bombay High Court had earlier ruled that the National Spot Exchange Ltd (NSEL) is not a financial establishment and hence notifications for attachment of the company's assets including bank accounts and properties under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act stand quashed.

The Bombay HC had quashed all the notifications issued by the state government in 2016 and 2018 attaching movable and immovable properties of 63 moons under the MPID Act 1999 by observing that NSEL is not a financial establishment since it did not accept any deposits as defined under the MPID Act.

In 2016, the Economic Offences Wing of Mumbai police attached assets worth Rs 7,063 crore belonging to Financial Technologies India Ltd (FTIL) owned and founded by Jignesh Shah.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Jignesh shahBombay High CourtSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudJustice of bombay high courtBombay highSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

MumbaiBombay HC Seeks CPCB Reply on Proposal to Allow PoP Idol Immersion in Oceans Ahead of Ganeshotsav

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

National Realted Stories

National'Proud of our Armed Forces': Rahul Gandhi Reacts to Operation Sindoor Air Strikes

NationalOperation Sindoor is Bharat's response to Pahalgam terror attack, says HM Shah

NationalOperation Sindoor Targets Terror Camps in Pakistan and PoK, Not Pakistani Military, Says India

NationalOur loss can never be compensated, but happy with Operation Sindoor: Pahalgam victim's daughter

NationalHigh alert in Rajasthan; two airports closed, schools shut in 3 border districts