City
Epaper

SC stays order banning operations of Media One

By ANI | Updated: March 15, 2022 16:50 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted interim relief to Media One by staying the central government's decision banning the Malayalam news channel and allowed it to resume broadcasting.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted interim relief to Media One by staying the central government's decision banning the Malayalam news channel and allowed it to resume broadcasting.

A bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud allowed running Media One channel on the same basis that it was being operated before its security clearance was revoked.

The Court also directed that a counter affidavit be filed in the next two weeks.

Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, told the court that many people are losing their jobs and no media channel will be safe in the country if such practice is allowed.

The Supreme Court was hearing the Media One plea challenging the Kerala High Court order which upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of news channel, which will be heard on Friday.

In the Special Leave Petition preferred by Media one, through advocate Pallavi Pratap, the channel said that it has filed the petition under dire and compelling circumstances.

The petition also said that it raises seminal questions of law impinging upon the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression as well as the importance of an independent, free and unbiased press guaranteed by the Constitution.

The Kerala High Court on February 8 2022 upheld the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to revoke the license of Media One from the list of permitted news channels citing security reasons.

The Court dismissed petitions filed by the channel against the government order.

While dismissing the writ petition challenging the order of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, the Kerala High Court made it clear that principles of natural justice and interference by court in cases of national security have a very limited role.

Rejecting the pleas of the petitioner to keep the judgment in abeyance for two days, the Court replied, "I cannot extend it even for an hour."

The Single Bench of Justice N Nagaresh further observed in the order that "national security is considered as one of the most important sovereign functions for long."

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: courtSupreme CourtDy ChandrachudUk courtSeveral supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

MumbaiMumbai Crime Branch Files 689-Page Chargesheet Against Fake BARC Scientist

NationalPregnant Sunali Khatoon and Her Son, Deported as Bangladeshis, to Be Brought Back to India, Centre Tells Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump by 2% As Government Reviews AGR Relief Proposal

NationalSupreme Court Orders Nationwide Digital Arrest Cases to Be Transferred to CBI

National Realted Stories

NationalClose contest likely in 32 BMC seats between BJP-Sena alliance, Shiv Sena (UBT)-MNS combine

NationalTelangana committed to protect its share in Godavari waters: Irrigation Minister

NationalArunachal Guv meets CDS Chauhan, discusses key national security issues

NationalHow rural women in Chhattisgarh’s Sarkada achieved financial independence

NationalAbhishek Banerjee, Rahul Gandhi’s allegations against poll body similar, yet different