City
Epaper

SC strikes down West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 as unconstitutional

By ANI | Updated: May 4, 2021 13:15 IST

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (HIRA) as unconstitutional, which was passed to regulate the real estate sector in place of the central law, RERA.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (HIRA) as unconstitutional, which was passed to regulate the real estate sector in place of the central law, RERA.

A Bench headed by Justice DY Chandrachud declared as void and unconstitutional the HIRA, for being repugnant to the RERA Act.

The apex court said that if the Parliament has enacted a law on a subject, it is not open for the State legislature to pass a similar law.

"Once Parliament has enacted a law, it's not open to the State legislature to enact a similar law and lift it word to word. Test of repugnancy is clearly established," the top court said.

The judgment of the Bench comes on a plea was filed by the Forum For People's Collective Efforts, an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is identical to the Centre's RERA.

"HIRA has enacted a parallel mechanism and it is the same enactment as the Centre. Both the statutes refer to the same entry in the concurrent list in Schedule 7. The third test of repugnancy is that the subject matter of State enactment is same to Central enactment and post it," the Bench said in its order.

It further said that HIRA occupies the same subject as parliamentary enacted law. West Bengal has attempted to establish a parallel regime which is not permissible.

It also said in its verdict that the State Legislature has encroached on the subject of the parliamentary legislation which has a higher weightage in matters of entries of concurrent list. This analysis shows there is additional repugnancy between HIRA and RERA.

We conclude that HIRA being repugnant to RERA is unconstitutional, it stated."By exercising Article 142, we direct that striking down of West Bengal HIRA will not affect the sanctions or permissions granted under HIRA prior to the delivery of this judgment. This power has been exercised to safeguard past decisions and prevent chaos," the Bench said.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtHiraDy Chandrachud
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 2% a Day After Telecom Sector Plunges on Supreme Court Order

EntertainmentHAQ’ Promotions Begin: Emraan Hashmi, Yami Gautam Dhar Recreate Film Poster at Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Crashes Over 10% After Superme Court’s Written Order on AGR Dues Sparks Confuson

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Price Fall 3% After SC AGR Relief; Experts Call It a Risky Buy

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 9%, Touches ₹10 After Supreme Court Grants Relief in AGR Dues

National Realted Stories

NationalJ&K: Over 6,000 register for BSF marathon; motorcycle rally on Nov 9

NationalElection Commission failed to act impartially, says ex-Haryana CM Bhupinder Hooda

National‘Unsubstantiated rumours’: RBI dismisses reports of selling 35 tonnes of gold

NationalRahul's broken promise: Cobbler's gift gathers dust as family demands aid amid Bihar poll push

NationalJustice Ashok Bhushan reappointed NCLAT Chairperson