City
Epaper

Verdict on Rahul's 'chowkidar' goof-up pending

By IANS | Updated: August 16, 2019 09:20 IST

On May 10, the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi reserved order on the then Congress President Rahul Gandhi's plea to close criminal proceedings against him for wrongly attributing the "chowkidar chor hai" remark to the top court.

Open in App

He made the plea after tendering an apology to the apex court.

The hearings in the case were high-decibel arguments where the counsels fought hard on political statements made in the run-up to the Lok Sabha elections.

Three months on, a verdict is still awaited.

The contempt petition against Gandhi was filed by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Meenakshi Lekhi.

Senior advocate and Lekhi's counsel Mukul Rohatgi argued that Gandhi should apologize to the public for wrongfully linking the top court in a political speech.

"Rahul Gandhi led the public astray by saying that Supreme Court said 'chowkidar chor hai'. Hence, the court should pass an order asking Rahul Gandhi to apologise," Rohatgi had argued in the court.

Gandhi used the slogan "chowkidar chor hai" (security guard is a thief) in the elections to attack Prime Minister Narendra Modi in the context of the Rafale fighter deal.

In March when the Supreme Court agreed to hear some review petitions in the Rafale deal matter, Gandhi claimed that the top court had also said that "chowkidar chor hai". The Supreme Court took strong objection to this, asserting that it never said so.

Appearing for Gandhi, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi said the Congress leader had expressed regret even before the court had issued a notice.

The court, however, did not accept it, after which Gandhi tendered an apology.

"Therefore, the case should be closed," Singhvi had argued.

Rohatgi countered this, saying that the apology tendered by Gandhi should not be accepted, and necessary action should be taken against him as per the law.

In a three-page affidavit, Gandhi said: "The deponent unconditionally apologizes for the wrongful attribution to the court. The deponent further states that any such attributions were entirely unintentional, non-wilful and inadvertent."

Earlier, Gandhi had expressed regret for his remarks twice in two affidavits, saying that he made the comment in the "heat" of electioneering.

This justification did not go down well with the apex court, and it asked the Congress leader to file crisp apology again in the court.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Rahul GandhiMukul RohatgiSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtAbhishek Manu Singhvi
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

National Realted Stories

NationalCricketer Tilak Varma calls on Telangana CM Revanth Reddy

NationalManipur: Four militants arrested; arms, IEDs, drugs seized

NationalAshok Gehlot condemns RSS event at Rajasthan University, questions police role

NationalNine Assam contractual workers killed as arch collapses in Chennai's thermal power station

NationalPM Modi Condoles Death of 9 Workers in Arch Collapse at Tamil Nadu Power Plant; Announces Rs 2 Lakh Ex-Gratia