City
Epaper

Ascertainment of religious character of place of worship not barred by 1991 Act: SC

By IANS | Updated: May 20, 2022 19:00 IST

New Delhi, May 20 In an important observation, the Supreme Court on Friday orally observed that the ascertainment ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 20 In an important observation, the Supreme Court on Friday orally observed that the ascertainment of the religious character of a place of worship is not barred by the Places of Worship Act, 1991.

A bench, headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and comprising Justices Surya Kant and P.S. Narasimha said: "Ascertainment of religious character is not barred under Section 3 (of the Places of Worship Act, 1991)."

It told senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the masjid committee: "Suppose there is a Parsi temple and there is a cross in the corner of the area. Does the presence of Agyari make the cross Agyari or Agyari Christian? This hybrid character is not unknown in India."

Contesting it, Ahmadi replied that the religious character of the Gyanvapi mosque, on August 15, 1947, is not in dispute. However, counsel representing the Hindu parties insisted that is strongly in dispute.

As the bench further added that the ascertainment of the religious character of a place does not fall foul of the Section 3 and 4 of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, Ahmadi replied that if all these determinations are allowed to take place, the Act may become a dead letter.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Uttar Pradesh government, said that the Shivling should be protected.

According to Section 4 of the Act, the religious character of a place of worship existing on August 15, 1947 shall continue to be the same as it existed on that day. Section 3 of the Act says no person shall convert any place of worship of any religious denomination or any section thereof into a place of worship of a different section of the same religious denomination or of a different religious denomination or any section thereof.

Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Varanasi has opposed the suit relating to the Gyanvapi mosque, saying the civil court which is hearing the case is barred from doing so in view of the 1991 Act. The Supreme Court has asked the Varanasi District Judge to decide the suit.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Agyari christianHuzefa ahmadivaranasiNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westNew-delhiSeveral supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalVaranasi: Young Woman Attempts Suicide After Boyfriend Slaps Her During Heated Argument

NationalVande Bharat Express Food Row: Passenger Claims ‘Life-Threatening’ Reaction After Eating Food on Varanasi Deoghar Vande Bharat Express

NationalVaranasi Tragedy: Cylinder Explosion Kills Two, Family Members Injured

NationalUttar Pradesh Weather Update: Varanasi Faces Scorching Heatwave; Temple Makes Special Arrangements for Devotees

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsAmit Shah to unveil BJP's 'Sankalp Patra' in Kolkata today, pledges change in West Bengal

PoliticsWest Bengal backing BJP's development agenda, says PM Modi after Asansol roadshow

PoliticsTMC goons harassing RG Kar victim's mother: Smriti Irani

Politics"Some projects are done for public good and not for profit": BJP's Aparajita Sarangi urges Odisha CM to reconsider Metro project suspension

Politics"CM has taken the decision," says JDU MLA Jayant Raj Kushwaha on Nitish Kumar's Rajya Sabha oath taking ceremony