City
Epaper

'Deprivation of liberty cannot be unduly long': SC grants bail to septuagenarian Maoist

By IANS | Updated: December 1, 2021 21:05 IST

New Delhi, Dec 1 The Supreme Court on Wednesday said deprivation of liberty cannot be unduly long, as ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 1 The Supreme Court on Wednesday said deprivation of liberty cannot be unduly long, as it granted bail to a Maharashtra-based Bengali engineer, Ashim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya, accused of helping Maoists to manufacture a rocket launcher.

A bench of Justices Ajay Rastogi and Abhay S. Oka said: "While deprivation of personal liberty for some period may not be avoidable, period of deprivation pending trial/appeal cannot be unduly long. At the same time, timely delivery of justice is part of human rights and denial of speedy justice is a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice."

The bench noted that the appellant was 74 years of age and he was arrested in July 2012.

"It is clearly demonstrated from the instant case that after the charge sheet came to be filed in the year 2012, charges have been framed in June 2019 and looking to the voluminous record and number of the prosecution witnesses which are to be examined, it may take its own time to conclude and indeed, the undertrial prisoner cannot be detained for such a long period of incarceration noticed by us in the instant case," it said.

"Once it is obvious that a timely trial would not be possible and the accused has suffered incarceration for a significant period of time, the courts would ordinarily be obligated to enlarge him on bail," it said.

The apex court pointed out that though charges against accused are serious, but it needs to be balanced with factors like the period of incarceration undergone and the likelihood period within which the trial is expected to be completed.

The top court also directed the Centre and West Bengal government to ensure setting up of more designated special courts in the state for day-to-day trials.

"This court has consistently observed in its numerous judgments that the liberty guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution would cover within its protective ambit not only due procedure and fairness but also access to justice and a speedy trial is imperative and the undertrials cannot indefinitely be detained pending trial," it said.

The top court also directed thee Centre to take up the matter with the state government after consultation with the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court, for setting up more special courts for speedy trial in such cases.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: DECAshim kumar haranath bhattacharyaThe Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSC Constitution Bench defers hearing after AG says govt has set up expert committee on arbitration

NationalSC Constitution Bench defers hearing after AG says govt has set up expert committee on arbitration

InternationalAfghanistan: Four people publicly flogged by Taliban

National2020 Delhi riots: SC adjourns Umar Khalid's bail plea hearing for July 24

PoliticsIsraeli parliament gives initial approval to controversial bill

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days

NationalBJP Candidate Satish Kumar Leading Over Tejashwi Yadav in Raghopur Assembly Constituency

NationalBihar Assembly Election Results 2025: Tejashwi Yadav Leads, Tej Pratap Trails in Early Trends

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

MaharashtraWho Is Akshaya Naik? Shetkari Kamgar Paksha Named Mayoral Candidate of Alibag