Shivaz berry - Latest News Update, Information, Photos & Videos on Shivaz berry at Lokmat Times

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court order dismissing a plea with a fine of Rs 50,000 against a company in connection with eviction from a tenanted premise."We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petition is dismissed," said a bench of justices Abdul Nazeer and Aniruddha Bose.The top court was hearing the company plea challenging a Delhi HC order. The Delhi High Court had dismissed a plea with a cost of Rs 50,000 against the petitioner observing that "dishonest litigants cannot be allowed to abuse the process of the Court."The HC had also said that the conduct of the petitioner itself would disentitle the petitioner of any relief in the present petition.The HC had rejected the plea of the company challenging the order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC), Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the Executing Court has issued warrants of execution in respect of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.On July 12, 2010, the ARC allowed the eviction petition filed by the landlord as the tenant failed to file the leave to defend. However, in terms of settlement arrived at between the tenant and landlord, 10 years' time was granted to the tenant to vacate the tenanted premises. Upon expiry of 10 years, the landlord filed the execution petition from which the present petition arises.Further, in the order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Executing Court, request of the tenant to file a reply to the execution petition was rejected and warrants of execution of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010, were issued after noting that no appeal/revision has been preferred by the tenant against the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.The court was dealing with a petition filed by the tenant against his landlord seeking eviction from tenanted premises in Ajmeri Gate. The petitioner company has challenged an order dated November 18, 2021, passed by the Additional Rent Controller in Tis Hazari Courts, whereby the Executing Court has issued warrants of execution in respect of the order/decree dated July 12, 2010.The respondent landlord was represented by advocates Prabhav Ralli and Shivaz Berry.( With inputs from ANI )Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Home

City

Latest News

Cricket

LT Premium

National

International

Maharashtra

Opinions

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

Nagpur

Entertainment

Photos

Business

Technology

Sports

Lifestyle

Social Viral

Lokmat Games

Health

Pahalgam Terror Attack

Tahawwur Rana

IPL 2025

CM Devendra Fadnavis

Mumbai Local

Weather Update

Shivaz BerryFOLLOW

Shivaz berry, Latest News

National :SC declines to interfere in Delhi HC order on tenant-landlord dispute case

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court order dismissing a plea with a fine of Rs 50,000 against a company in connection with eviction from a tenanted premise. ...