Supertech ltd. - Latest News Update, Information, Photos & Videos on Supertech ltd. at Lokmat Times

New Delhi, Aug 3 Real estate firm Supertech Ltd on Tuesday submitted before the Supreme Court that the Emerald Court owner Resident Welfare Association, which has challenged the construction of two 40 storey towers, is making "unwarranted claims" against the builder.Senior advocate Vikas Singh, representing Supertech Ltd, submitted before a bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud that there was no violation of any norms in construction of its twin towers and the resident welfare association is not correct."The resident welfare association has been terrorising the builder by making unwarranted claims," he said.The RWA claimed while constructing twin towers, Supertech flouted the building safety norms and distance criteria, and encroached upon the garden area and blocked their view and sunshine.Advocate Gaurav Agrawal, appointed as amicus curiae in the matter, said that many home buyers, who have booked flats in the new twin towers were refunded their payment while many have chosen to wait.The bench, also comprising Justice M.R. Shah, told Singh it is apparent that the towers were constructed by encroaching upon the green common area of the housing society. Singh replied that the association has been raising new points in the court which were never argued before the high court."I would like to put everything on the affidavit which I will file on Wednesday morning before the start of court's work," he said, adding that he will continue his arguments.Agarwal submitted that if court upholds these twin towers have not violated norms, then it will have to look into the problems faced by the residents of these towers."Like it was done in demolition of buildings in Kerala's Maradu, the people will have to be evacuated and then the demolition could be done by using explosives," he said.He recommended that if the court decides the twin buildings are in violation of norms, then it will be better that the builder is asked to pay double compensation to residents.Advocate Ravindra Kumar, representing NOIDA authority, said that there was nothing wrong in the sanction given to the building plan and no norms were violated at all.The top court is hearing appeals of Supertech Ltd and other petitions filed by home buyers for or against the Allahabad High Court's 2014 order, which directed demolition of the twin towers for violating norms.The top court will continue to hear the matter on Wednesday.Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Home

City

Latest News

Cricket

LT Premium

National

International

Maharashtra

Opinions

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

Nagpur

Entertainment

Photos

Business

Technology

Sports

Lifestyle

Social Viral

Lokmat Games

Health

Lok Sabha Election 2024

Heatwave In India

Mumbai Water Cut

Maharashtra Lok Sabha Election

IPL 2024

Salman Khan

Supertech Ltd.FOLLOW

Supertech ltd., Latest News

National :Supertech twin towers case: SC asks builder to refund payments to home buyers by Feb 28

The Supreme Court on Friday directed the real estate developer Supertech Ltd. to refund payments to the home buyers for the flats which were ordered to be demolished in its Emerald Court project in Noida, on or before February 28. ...

National :SC directs Supertech to enter into contract with firm within a week to demolish its twin-towers in Noida

The Supreme Court on Monday directed real estate developer Supertech Ltd to execute a contract within a week with a company to demolish its twin 40-storey towers in its Emerald Court project in Noida. ...

International :Demolition of twin towers: SC junks Supertech's plea seeking modification

New Delhi, Oct 4 The Supreme Court on Monday junked an application by Supertech Ltd seeking modification in ... ...

International :Emerald Court RWA terrorising builder with unwarranted claims: Supertech

New Delhi, Aug 3 Real estate firm Supertech Ltd on Tuesday submitted before the Supreme Court that the ... ...