City
Epaper

Petitioners in SC say interest on interest in moratorium is double whammy

By IANS | Published: September 02, 2020 3:04 PM

New Delhi, Sep 2 The Supreme Court on Wednesday observed that there is no dearth of power with ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 2 The Supreme Court on Wednesday observed that there is no dearth of power with the RBI, as the petitioners' counsel argued that banks are free to restructure loans but not at the cost of penalising honest borrowers by charging interest on deferred EMI payments during the moratorium.

Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar, representing the Shopping Centres Association, contended before a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan that shopping centres are closed, yet are paying the employees. The bench replied there is no dearth of power with the RBI, and no one is denying that. Kumar contended that pharma, FMCG and Internet companies did very well, but industries like his client's did very badly. "We are entitled to relief", submitted Kumar.

Senior advocate Rajiv Dutta, appearing for one of the petitioners Gajendra Sharma, submitted that his client thought everything was okay when EMIs were waived off, but the government ended up charging compound interest. "A kind of double whammy for us (borrowers)", submitted Dutta.

Senior advocate K V Viswanathan, representing CREDAI Maharashtra and the Association of Power Producers, said this is not an ordinary situation for banking transactions and the power sector is extremely stressed. He insisted that the top court should direct banks to forego their profits because this an extraordinary situation, and there is 15 to 20 percent reduction in demand, as customers are not taking power. The bench asked Viswanathan to submit a note on his arguments, which the bench will continue to hear.

The Finance Ministry in an affidavit has informed the Supreme Court that a waiver of interest on interest during the moratorium would go against the basic canons of finance, and the August 6 RBI circular permitted lenders to allow a moratorium of up to two years. The affidavit was filed in response to a bunch of petitions demanding waiver of interest, or waiver of interest on interest on the deferred EMIs during the moratorium period.

/

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: SeptemberRanjit KumarSupreme CourtAshok Bhushan
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

Business Realted Stories

BusinessDiversifying by asset class can help build an all-weather mutual fund portfolio

BusinessSymbiosis Law School (SLS), Hyderabad's BA/BBA LLB Programmes: Applications Open for the Institute Until May 16, 2024

BusinessRenowned philanthropist Dr Vijay Kishore Bansal invited as Chief Guest PRISAL GLOBAL LEADERSHIP AWARDS in Dubai

BusinessKLM Axiva Finvest Opens New Headquarters at Kochi

BusinessBacancy Successfully Manufactures India's First Power Module for EV, Telecom and Storage Application