City
Epaper

Can't impose compensation to victims as a bail condition: SC

By IANS | Published: July 12, 2021 7:36 PM

New Delhi, July 12 The Supreme Court has observed a condition of payment of compensation to victims cannot ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 12 The Supreme Court has observed a condition of payment of compensation to victims cannot be imposed at the stage of granting bail.

A bench comprising Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hemant Gupta said: "We may hasten to add that we are not saying that no monetary condition can be imposed for grant of bail. We say so as there are cases of offences against property or otherwise but that cannot be a compensation to be deposited and disbursed as if that grant has to take place as a condition of the person being enlarged on bail."

The bench noted that it is clear from a plain reading of Section 357 that such compensation can only arise after the conclusion of trial albeit, of course, the same being a matter of discretion. Thus, without a full-fledged trial, there cannot be a sentence and, thus, there cannot be any such compensation, the bench added.

The top court order came on the plea of two accused, who were granted bail by the high court with a condition requiring them to deposit Rs 2 lakh each as compensation to the victims. An FIR was registered at Amreli police station in November 2019, regarding a fight between the complainant and certain members of his caste. Two persons succumbed to their injuries and an FIR was registered against 13 persons under various sections, which included Sections 302, 307, 324 etc.,

The bench observed in cases of offences against body, compensation to the victim should be a methodology for redemption. However, it said: "To prevent unnecessary harassment, compensation has been provided where meaningless criminal proceedings had been started. Such a compensation can hardly be determined at the stage of grant of bail."

The bench said the deposit of compensation of Rs 2 lakh for the legal heirs of the deceased, naturally cannot be sustained and has to be logically set aside. "We consider it appropriate to impose the same terms and conditions for grant of bail upon the appellants and set aside condition of the bail requiring the appellants to deposit Rs 2 lakh each towards compensation to the victims before the trial court and the consequential orders for disbursement," said the bench.

The bench imposed another condition that the appellants will not enter the geographical limits of Amreli for a period of six months except for marking presence before the police station concerned and to attend the court proceedings.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Sanjay Kishan KaulSupreme CourtHemant guptaSanjay kishan
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

International Realted Stories

InternationalSharjah Economic Development Department issues, renews 17,722 licenses during Q1-24

InternationalMaktoum bin Mohammed engages with global policymakers, financial industry leaders at second Dubai FinTech Summit

InternationalHamas says accepts ceasefire terms amid pending Rafah offensive, Israel yet to respond

InternationalIHC records net profit of AED8 billion in Q1 2024, launches AED5 billion Share Buyback Programme

International"We will not participate...": Russian Foreign Minister on Ukraine Peace Summit in Switzerland