City
Epaper

Abu Salem withdraws plea from Delhi HC stating his detention in India was 'illegal'

By ANI | Updated: May 5, 2022 15:30 IST

The Delhi High Court on Thursday allowed the withdrawal of a petition of gangster Abu Salem, who claimed his extradition was illegal and liable to be cancelled because of a breach of terms by Indian authorities.

Open in App

The Delhi High Court on Thursday allowed the withdrawal of a petition of gangster Abu Salem, who claimed his extradition was illegal and liable to be cancelled because of a breach of terms by Indian authorities.

The bench of Justice Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar on Thursday allowed the Counsel appearing for the petitioner to withdraw the petition after noting his submission that the issue is now pending before the Supreme Court.

Earlier, Abu Salem's counsel stated that in view of the alleged breach of the terms of extradition by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Central Bureau of India (CBI), his further detention of him in India has become illegal.

The bench of Justice Sidharth Mridul and Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani earlier, asked the Advocate S Hari Haran appeared for Abu Salem to 'place on record' the relevant judgements and documents in referring to 'how habeas corpus petition is made out in this case'.

Earlier the bench had orally observed that once a court of law held Abu Salem guilty, he could not say that the custody was illegal. The bench further observed that even if initially his detention was bad in law, after his conviction by a court of law, his custody does not remain illegal.

The plea further stated that in view of the breach of solemn sovereign assurance given by the Respondents seeking the extradition of the Petitioner and which formed the basis of his extradition to India.

Habeas Corpus petition of Gangster or Underworld don Abu Salem seeks court appropriate direction declaring his detention as illegal and be released and repatriated to Portugal

Last year, the Supreme Court of India declined to entertain a petition of Abu Salem and said "We dismiss the plea under Article 32 with the liberty to approach High Court".

In SC, the plea also sought a direction to transfer Salem from Taloja jail to Tihar jail so that amicus curiae can speak to him and procure some documents. Salem argued that the Indian authorities had violated the extradition treaty.

Salem, an accused in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts, had been extradited from Portugal on November 11, 2005, after a prolonged legal battle.

The gangster is serving a life sentence in jail after being convicted in the 1993 Mumbai blasts that had killed 257 and injured 713 people. He has also been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment in a 2002 extortion case by Delhi Court.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: mumbaiDelhi High CourtSupreme CourtSalemSiddharth mridulDelhi delhi high courtAbu SalemSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelU.k. high court
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiMumbai: 21-Year-Old Engineering Student Jumps To Death From Sathe College in Vile Parle

Other SportsINDIA'S TENNIS CRICKET LEGENDS AND UPCOMING STAR PLAYERS MEET UP IN MUMBAI

MumbaiMumbai Metro Line 3: Leaks and Damp Walls Raise Safety Concerns At BKC Aqualine Station (See Post)

Navi MumbaiMumbai: Commuters Struggle at Roofless Badlapur Station Amidst Heavy Rains

MumbaiMumbai Rain Update: IMD Predicts Heavy Rainfall Over Next 24 Hours in City and Surrounding Areas

National Realted Stories

NationalMP: Sex racket busted in Jabalpur, five arrested

NationalBihar: PM Surya Ghar Yojana brings subsidies, zero electricity bills to Kishanganj residents

NationalAir India Aircraft and Its Engines Showed No Issues Before Flight, Says CEO Campbell Wilson On Ahmedabad Crash

NationalWheat procurement in UP crosses 10.27 lakh metric tonnes in 2025–26

National'Rakshasa Raj’ in Bihar now, says Rabri Devi in attack on Nitish govt