City
Epaper

Attorney General for India KK Venugopal opposes plea seeking to enforce fundamental duties

By ANI | Updated: April 4, 2022 15:05 IST

Attorney General for India KK Venugopal on Monday opposed a plea filed in the Supreme Court, seeking to enforce fundamental duties as enshrined in Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.

Open in App

Attorney General for India KK Venugopal on Monday opposed a plea filed in the Supreme Court, seeking to enforce fundamental duties as enshrined in Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court was hearing a petition seeking enforcement of fundamental duties as enshrined in the Constitution and to frame guidelines for taking appropriate adequate steps to sensitize the people and spread general awareness among the citizens in relation to the performance of fundamental duties under the Constitution of India.

AG Venugopal also informed the top court that the Department of Justice has put a lot of information regarding it on its website.

Meanwhile, the bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul said that it was informed that the Centre would be represented by Solicitor General. The court listed the matter in the first week of July.

The petitioner has sought direction to the Respondents Union of India and State Governments to the effect of ensuring performance/discharge of the Fundamental Duties by all who are entitled to enjoy the fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution of India.The petition was filed by Durga Dutt through advocate on record Karunakar Mahalik.

The petitioner has sought direction from the Respondents to carry out the enactment of appropriate legislation for effectuation and implementation of Fundamental Duties where required.

The petitioner Dutt, who is an Advocate-On-Record of the top Court said that he has filed the petition in the public interest, "for issuance of directives ensuring adherence to the mandates as postulated under Part IV-A of Constitution of India because non-adherence to the same has a direct bearing upon the exercise and enjoyment of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India for formulation and operationalization of appropriate scheme providing incentives to the citizenry for their adherence."

The petitioner had submitted that the Fundamental Duties are intended to serve as a constant reminder to every citizen that while the Constitution conferred on them certain Fundamental Rights specifically, it also required citizens to observe certain basic norms of democratic conduct and democratic behavior because rights and duties are correlative.

The petitioner has prayed to issue "directions to the respondents to make comprehensive well defined laws/rules ensuring the adherence to the provisions of Part IV-A of the Constitution of India effectively and requiring the citizens to perform their fundamental duties properly."

The petition said that there shall be done as per the decision given by the top Court in the matter of "Ranganath Mishra Vs Union of India and Ors," being Writ Petition No. 239 of 1998 as reported in (2003 Supp(2) SCR 59).

The petitioner demanded that the direction of the Court be implemented fully in the true spirit of providing incentives to the citizens for operationalization enforcement and sensitization with respect to the implementation of Fundamental Duties"

The petition has also sought to issue directions for directives for interpretation and adherence to the mandates as postulated under Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner also sought to set up an independent High Powered Committee headed by a retired Chief Justice or Judge of this Court or High Court and consisting of distinguished citizens from different fields/professions concerned officials of the stakeholders and the Respondents to scrutinize and review the entire legal framework relating to the effective implementation of Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.

The petition also sought direction for issuance of directives for interpretation and adherence to the mandates as postulated under Part IV-A of the Constitution of India and direction for setting up of an independent High Powered Committee headed by a retired Chief Justice or Judge of this top Court or High Court and consisting of distinguished citizens from different professions and concerned officials of the stakeholders.

It also sought to issue direction to the Respondents Union of India and State Governments to the effect of ensuring performance/discharge of the Fundamental Duties by all who are entitled to enjoy the fundamental rights under Part III of the Constitution of India.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: K. K. VenugopalSanjay Kishan KaulSupreme CourtDurga DuttSanjay kishanSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalGovt and agency should find conspirators of Malegaon bomb blast: Bhaiyaji Joshi

NationalUP Police telecom gets 1,494 new recruits as CM Yogi hands over appointment letters

NationalCM Mohan Majhi announces ex gratia for 6 Odia migrants killed in Andhra quarry blast

NationalTelangana ranks number one in organ donation

NationalManipur govt expands police organisation to boost policing capability