City
Epaper

Bhushan cites 2018 press meet, SC hopes its last time judges go to press

By IANS | Published: August 31, 2020 4:25 PM

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 31 As advocate Prashant Bhushan, defending his expression of opinion through tweets, cited the press conference held by sitting apex court judges in January 2018, the Supreme Court on Monday dismissed his argument, saying it is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no such concept.

A bench comprising Justices Arun Mishra, B.R. Gavai and Krishna Murari said: "We hope it was the first and the last occasion that the judges have gone to press, and god gives wisdom to protect its dignity by an internal mechanism, particularly, when allegations made, if any, publicly cannot be met by sufferer judges. It would cause suffering to them till eternity."

The apex court said Bhushan tried to justify the averments he made on the basis of the press conference held by the four senior-most judges of the court.

"Concept of equality before law... what is permissible, not as to what is impermissible. It is settled that negative equality cannot be claimed as there is no concept of negative equality," said the bench.

The top court said truth can be a defence to the judges also, but they are bound by judicial norms, ethics, and code of conduct. "Similarly, the code of conduct for advocates is equally applicable to the lawyers also, being part of the system. The Rules of Professional Ethics formed by the Bar Council, though couched under statutory powers, are themselves not enough to prescribe or proscribe the nobility of profession in entirety. The nobility of profession encompasses, over and above, the Rules of Ethics," observed the top court.

The bench said that fair criticism is based on the authentic and acceptable material permissible, but when criticism tends to create apprehension in the minds of the people regarding integrity, ability and fairness of the judge, it amounts to contempt. "Such criticism is not protected under Article 19

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Arun MishraPrashant BhushanBar CouncilSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: No Official Duties If Released, Supreme Court Tells Arvind Kejriwal

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Supreme Court Questions ED Over Delay in Probe, Asks for Case Files Before Arvind Kejriwal’s Arrest

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

National Realted Stories

NationalConstituency Watch: Nizamabad LS seat in Telangana set for three-cornered contest

NationalLS polls: Nomination of 4 candidates in Gurgaon seat cancelled during scrutiny

NationalCM Sawant expresses happiness over high voter turnout in Goa

NationalTeachers, students in Kota barred from using mobile phones during school hours

NationalJapanese Ambassador on two-day Nagaland visit to strengthen ties