City
Epaper

Each individual in J-K was waiting for this decision: Ghulam Nabi Azad on SC order over reviewing of restrictive orders

By ANI | Published: January 10, 2020 2:31 PM

After the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the Union Territory within a week, senior Congress Ghulam Nabi Azad said that each individual in the region was waiting for the decision.

Open in App

After the Supreme Court on Friday directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the Union Territory within a week, senior Congress Ghulam Nabi Azad said that each individual in the region was waiting for the decision.

"Each individual in Jammu and Kashmir was waiting for this decision. Supreme Court has made it clear to the government that they should publish all the orders passed since August 5, 2019. The court has also said that any order on internet comes under judicial scrutiny," Azad said.

The top court while hearing the petitions challenging restrictions in Jammu and Kashmir stated that the right to access the internet is a fundamental right under Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

"It is no doubt that freedom of speech is an essential tool in a democratic setup. The freedom of Internet access is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution," a two-judge bench headed by Justice N V Ramana stated while reading out the judgment.

The top court said that Kashmir has seen a lot of violence and that it will try to maintain a balance between human rights and freedoms with the issue of security.

It also directed the Jammu and Kashmir administration to review the restrictive orders imposed in the region within a week. "The citizens should be provided highest security and liberty,' the apex court said.

The top court made observations and issued directions while pronouncing the verdict on a number of petitions challenging the restrictions and internet blockade imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of Article 370 in August last year.

The Supreme Court had on November 27 reserved the judgment on a batch of petitions challenging restrictions imposed on communication, media and telephone services in Jammu and Kashmir pursuant to revocation of Article 370.

The court heard the petitions filed by various petitioners including Ghulam Nabi Azad and Kashmir Times editor Anuradha Bhasin.

The petitions were filed after the central government scrapped Article 370 in August and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories -- Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Following this, phone lines and the internet were blocked in the region. The government had, however, contended that it has progressively eased restrictions.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: kashmirjammuSupreme CourtGhulam Nabi AzadThe Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Be Released From Jail? We May Consider Granting Interim Bail to Delhi CM, Says Supreme Court

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

National Realted Stories

NationalAir Force pays tribute to warrior slain in Poonch terror attack

NationalUttar Pradesh Shocker: Computer Teacher Shot Dead by Student in Bijnor for Rejecting ‘Friendship’ Proposal

PoliticsLok Sabha Election 2024: Congress Lodges Complaint Against JP Nadda and Amit Malviya for Alleged Intimidation of Voters in Karnataka

NationalDelhi Police bust fake spices manufacturing units, three held

NationalMadras High Court Orders Implementation of E-pass System for Tourist Vehicles to Nilgiris and Kodaikanal