City
Epaper

PIL in Delhi HC seeks steps for compulsory voting in Parliament, State Assembly elections to enhance voter turnout

By ANI | Updated: March 15, 2023 10:50 IST

New Delhi [India], March 15 : A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been moved in Delhi High Court on ...

Open in App

New Delhi [India], March 15 : A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been moved in Delhi High Court on Wednesday seeking direction to the Centre and Election Commission of India (ECI) to take apposite steps for compulsory voting in the Parliament and State Assembly elections, in order to enhance voter's turnout, promote political participation, improve quality of democracy and to secure right to vote.

The petitioner Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, practising Advocate and BJP leader also seeks direction from the Law Commission to prepare a report on Compulsory Voting.

The plea stated that low voter turnout is a persistent problem in India. Compulsory voting can help to increase voter turnout, particularly among marginalized communities. It ensures that every citizen has a voice and that the government is representative of the people's wishes. When voter turnout is high, the government is more accountable to the people and is more likely to act in their best interests.

Compulsory voting has been implemented successfully in other countries, including Australia, Belgium, and Brazil. These countries have seen significant increases in voter turnout and improvements in the quality of democracy, stated the plea.

The Supreme Court and High Court have repeatedly issued directions in the past to the Election Commission to exercise its powers under Article 324 with respect to superintendence, direction and control of the conduct of elections to Parliament and the State legislatures to redress violations of the fundamental rights and to protect the purity of the electoral process and there is a good reason why the Court must take steps for simultaneous election, plea said.

The Constitution provides for the right to vote as a fundamental right under Article 326. This right is subject to reasonable restrictions imposed by law. Compulsory voting can be implemented as a reasonable restriction in the interest of ensuring the smooth functioning of democracy. The Supreme Court has also held that the right to vote is a statutory right, and the government has the power to impose reasonable restrictions on this right, further read the plea

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ashwini kumar upadhyayindiaNew DelhiDelhi High CourtPublic Interest LitigationDelhi delhi high courtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiUniversity of Bristol Chooses Mumbai for Its First Overseas Campus, Set to Open in September 2026

NationalRaksha Bandhan 2025: Now You Can Send a Rakhi to Your Brother in India Post's Waterproof Envelope — Here's How to Track Your Parcel

NationalGold in Dubai Cheaper Than India: Pricing, Rules, and Import Limits Explained

NationalDelhi High Court: Disruption of Parliament viewed as a serious threat

NationalIndia Spends ₹1.38 Lakh Crore Annually on Edible Oil Imports

National Realted Stories

National‘Gangrape’ of minor girl in Mumbai, one arrested

NationalDespite tough terrain, Nagaland making steady progress in transforming education infra: CM Rio

NationalTN: 'Aadi Perukku' festival tomorrow; Sub-Registrar offices to remain shut despite surge in registration demand

NationalMaha: Mumbai registers first FIR for feeding pigeons

NationalBhupesh Baghel moves SC, challenges CBI-ED jurisdiction in multi-crore liquor scam probe