City
Epaper

PWD hiring case: Big relief for Satyendar Jain as Delhi court accepts CBI closure report

By IANS | Updated: August 4, 2025 18:14 IST

New Delhi, Aug 4 In a big relief for former Delhi Minister and AAP leader Satyendar Jain, a ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 4 In a big relief for former Delhi Minister and AAP leader Satyendar Jain, a Delhi court on Monday accepted a closure report filed by the CBI in a case related to the allegedly irregular hiring of consultants in the PWD department in 2018.

Special CBI Judge Dig Vinay Singh took the closure report on record, saying, “Further proceedings would serve no useful purpose.”

The court, however, allowed liberty to the federal probe agency to investigate the matter further in the event of receiving any fresh material.

“In the facts and circumstances mentioned above, in the absence of any evidence and sanction, the present final report for closure of the FIR is accepted,” the court said.

The Special Judge took the view while noting that despite a long probe, no incriminating proof was found to support corruption charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 or any other penal provision.

In its closure report, the CBI admitted that no prosecutable evidence was found and made two critical observations: No evidence was found against Jain, and no loss was caused to the Delhi government by the decisions taken in the recruitment matter.

The complaint, filed by the Delhi government’s Directorate of Vigilance, revolved around the allegedly irregular hiring of a creative team of consultants by the PWD officials and Jain.

After the closure report, the court said that not all decisions taken in an official capacity, even if they are not strictly within the rules, need to be scrutinised through the lens of corruption.

“There must be some material to justify applying the provisions of the POC Act, 1988,” the court said, adding that there was no evidence to even invoke provisions related to criminal conspiracy.

“The law clearly states that suspicion cannot replace proof. It is also worth noting that, even to charge someone, mere suspicion is not enough; at least strong suspicion would be necessary to proceed,” the court said.

The primary allegation in the complaint was that Jain approved the hiring of a 17-member team of consultants for the PWD via outsourcing, which allegedly bypassed standard government recruitment procedures.

The CBI claimed that there were irregularities in the recruitment process that could amount to criminal conspiracy and corruption, such as modifying eligibility conditions in the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) for a private company and making unauthorised budget allocations.

The decision comes as a big relief for Jain, who is out on bail and facing several cases related to corruption and money laundering linked to disproportionate assets, classroom construction, CCTV installation and upgradation of sewage treatment plant.

--IANS

rch/dan

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

HealthBone Cancer: Want to Protect Your Bone Health? Start by Noticing These Small Clues

TechnologyIndusInd Bank shares up after RBI approves Rajiv Anand as new MD and CEO

Other SportsMboko's dream run continues in Montreal, reaches first WTA 1000 semis

Entertainment‘Mandala Murders’ creator Gopi Puthran: India is a mythical place

BusinessOver 130 Indian MLAs & MLCs from 24 States, 21 Parties to Attend Global NCSL Summit in Boston, Facilitated by NLC Bharat 2025

National Realted Stories

NationalMP: 29 killed in rain-related incidents in July last week, says Jyotiraditya Scindia

NationalChennai to roll out AI-powered adaptive traffic signals at 165 junctions

NationalAssam CM announces Alabai Memorial to honour 10,000 Ahom martyrs

NationalRAC jawan shoots Labour Inspector dead in Jaipur, surrenders

National'PM Modi changed our lives': Chhattisgarh farmers hail PM-Kisan scheme