City
Epaper

SC agrees to hear PIL on providing details of candidates on EVMs and not just party symbols

By ANI | Updated: March 19, 2021 13:50 IST

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to issue notice, but asked the petitioner, BJP leader and lawyer, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, to serve a copy to the Attorney General (AG) K K Venugopal, on his plea seeking a direction to use the name, age, qualification and photograph of contesting candidates on electronic voting machines in place of political party symbol.

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to issue notice, but asked the petitioner, BJP leader and lawyer, Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, to serve a copy to the Attorney General (AG) K K Venugopal, on his plea seeking a direction to use the name, age, qualification and photograph of contesting candidates on electronic voting machines in place of political party symbol.

A three-judge bench of the Apex Court, headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde and also comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubraman, asked the Bharatiya Janata Party leader and lawyer, Upadhyay, to serve a copy to the AG, Venugopal on the said issue.

"The party symbol is the root cause of corruption, and criminalisation, and thereby he sought appropriate orders and or directions to use name, age, qualification and photograph of contesting candidates on Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in place of a political party symbol," the plea stated.

Former Additional Solicitor General (ASG) and Senior Supreme Court lawyer, Vikas Singh, appearing for the petitioner, Upadhyay, today told the Apex Court that he had checked and found that in Brazil, you just get numbers to contest and no symbols.

Singh also submitted to the Apex Court bench led by the CJI Bobde that in the Representation of People's (RP) Act, when any political party is registered only these details are asked for.

To this, the CJI Bobde asked Singh, how does a symbol can prejudice the electronic voting process in any way?

While responding, Singh said that the intrinsic value of the candidates can be taken and measured by the voters if these can be taken into consideration.

The CJI, however, said that we will not issue a notice at this stage. "But, you please serve a copy to the AG, Venugopal" in the issue.

"You (petitioner) serve a copy on the Attorney General and then we will see. No notice now," the CJI Bobde said.

Singh also submitted to the Apex Court that he had sent a letter to the Election Commission of India (ECI) and other authorities, but they didn't get any response yet in the matter.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Ashwini kumar upadhyayAgSupreme CourtSharad Arvind Bobde
Open in App

Related Stories

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

NationalRecording Phone calls Is Not Violation of Privacy in Marital Disputes, Says SC

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

National Realted Stories

NationalRiver water row: Nara Lokesh's remarks triggers fresh war of words between Telugu states

NationalIndia reaffirms sovereignty in Kashmir amid Pakistan’s continued obstructionism

NationalMeerut Crime: Man Kills Pregnant Wife in Cold Blood,Or Suspicion of Affair With Relative

NationalBJP slams NCP-SP MLA Jitendra Awhad for anti-Sanatan Dharma remarks

NationalSpeaking Pakistan's language: BJP slams Mani Shankar Aiyar over remarks on diplomatic efforts