City
Epaper

SC commutes death sentence to 25-yr life term in brutal murder of 8-yr old

By IANS | Updated: April 25, 2020 00:00 IST

(IANS) The Supreme Court on Friday imposed a minimum 25-year jail term on two persons who were concurrently awarded death penalty by the Bombay High Court for the cold-blooded killing of an eight-year-old boy of a Nagpur-based dentist couple in 2014.

Open in App

New Delhi, April 24 The Supreme Court on Friday imposed a minimum 25-year jail term on two persons who were concurrently awarded death penalty by the Bombay High Court for the cold-blooded killing of an eight-year-old boy of a Nagpur-based dentist couple in 2014.

A bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit, Indu Malhotra and Hemant Gupta said that after having considered all the circumstances and facts on record, the bench was of the considered view that the present case fell short of the "rarest of rare" cases where a death sentence alone deserved to be awarded to the appellants Arvind Singh and his associate in this case.

The apex court though concurred with the finding of the trial court and the high court that the prosecution had proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.

The convicts had posed as employees of the dental clinic run by the dentist couple and kidnapped the boy. Later, they demanded ransom before killing the child.

"The motive of the accused to take life was to become rich by not doing hard work but by demanding ransom after kidnapping a young, innocent boy of 8 years," said the court.

The court noted that the accused took the life of the young school going boy to become rich and to take vengeance against his father. The counsel of the accused argued that since the accused were young, aged about 19 years at the time of the crime, and had no criminal antecedents, the death sentence imposed upon them was not warranted.

"We do not find any merit in the argument that being young or having no criminal antecedents are mitigating circumstances. What is required to be examined is whether there is a possibility of rehabilitation and whether it is the rarest of the rare case where the collective conscience of the community is so shocked that it will expect the holders of judicial power to inflict death penalty, irrespective of their personal opinion as regards desirability or otherwise of retaining death penalty," said the court.

The court noted that the manner of commission of murder was extremely brutal, grotesque, diabolical, revolting or dastardly.

"It is further observed and directed that there shall not be any remission of the life term till the accused complete 25 years of imprisonment," said the court.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Bombay High CourtSupreme CourtArvind SinghHemant guptaJustice of bombay high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

MumbaiMumbai Pollution: Bombay High Court Calls Clean Air a Fundamental Right, Slams BMC Over Kanjurmarg Stench

MaharashtraMaharashtra: Bombay High Court Suspends Sentence of NCP Leader Manikrao Kokate, Grants Bail in 1995 Cheating and Forgery Case

MumbaiBomb Threats Issued to Bombay High Court and Magistrate Courts in Andheri, Bandra and Esplanade; Search Underway

MumbaiMumbai: Man Attempts Self-Immolation Outside Bombay High Court, Suffers Severe Burns

National Realted Stories

NationalHyderabad's annual trade fair 'Numaish' off to a colourful start

NationalBanner dispute turns violent in K'taka’s Ballari; Cong worker killed, MLA alleges assassination plot

NationalSIR in Bengal: ECI announces hearing relaxations for four categories of voters

NationalMaha SEC seeks report from BMC commissioner over complaints of non-acceptance of nominations

NationalOdisha government announces major IAS reshuffle