City
Epaper

SC dismisses PIL seeking mandatory virtual hearings in district judiciary

By IANS | Updated: September 6, 2024 17:35 IST

New Delhi, Sep 6 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 6 The Supreme Court on Friday declined to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking mandatory virtual hearing facilities in district courts for disposal of around 3.4 crore pending criminal cases.

"The issues raised in the petition are of policy. We cannot lay down one-size-fits-all solutions for the entire country. The country is too complex to issue these kinds of directions," said a bench headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud, at the very outset.

The Bench, also comprising Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, assured advocate KC Jain, the petitioner-in-person, that the project of virtual courts is being worked upon under phase-III of e-courts mission, where the Centre has allocated a budget of Rs 7,000 crore.

Dismissing the plea, it said: “These are critical aspects being looked into phase-III. But, we cannot issue directions on the judicial side. These are ongoing projects of bringing technology into the judiciary."

The PIL said that for effective implementation of the new criminal laws, it is necessary that virtual hearing facilities in district courts be made available. It called for taking proactive initiatives to address the substantial delays in the delivery of justice by the district judiciary, which otherwise is undermining public confidence.

"The hybrid mode of hearings in district courts is much needed, which would make it easier for the litigants to participate in the process, which would expedite the processes and reduce repeated adjournments," it said.

Further, the plea suggested separating pre-lunch and post-lunch sessions within a single day by the district judiciary to help litigants and lawyers manage their time more efficiently. “This approach will allow for better time management, improved case handling, and more efficient use of court resources. It will also reduce stress and travel difficulties for litigants, and address case backlogs," it added.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

International"Reckless threats will not affect offensive Ops, nor erase humiliation of US": Iran hits back at Trump

InternationalArtemis II crew begins seven hour flyby of Moon, observes far-side parts never seen by Humans

NationalMadhya Pradesh: Three-storey building collapses in Ujjain's Dhaba road, no injuries reported

International"Degree of reluctance to deploy ground troops": Former senior diplomat on Iran war

PoliticsTelangana CM Revanth Reddy performs Bhoomi Pooja for Basara temple expansion

National Realted Stories

NationalDelhi police arrest 19-yr-old for stabbing man to death

National"LDF and UDF destroyed Keralam": Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan ahead of assembly polls

NationalDwarka Accident case: Mother of deceased victim withdraws plea for CBI probe after Delhi Police assured cooperation

NationalAir India chief executive officer Campbell Wilson steps down: Sources

NationalTurkman Gate stone pelting: Court denies anticipatory bail to accused of leading mob