City
Epaper

SC expresses concern over delays by HCs in pronouncing judgements

By IANS | Updated: August 26, 2025 11:20 IST

New Delhi, Aug 26 The Supreme Court has voiced strong concern over long delays by High Courts in ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 26 The Supreme Court has voiced strong concern over long delays by High Courts in pronouncing judgments after hearings are concluded, warning that such a situation erodes “litigants’ faith in the judicial process”.

A Bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Prashant Kumar Mishra reiterated that if a judgment is not delivered within three months of being reserved, the Registrar General must place the case before the Chief Justice of the High Court, who will call upon the concerned Bench to pronounce it within two weeks. If the order is not passed even then, the Chief Justice will reassign the matter to another Bench, said the Justice Karol-led Bench.

It added that the Registrar General of each High Court must furnish to the Chief Justice a list of cases where reserved judgments are not pronounced within that month, and keep on repeating the same for three months.

The Supreme Court noted that it is “repeatedly confronted” with cases where proceedings are kept pending in the High Courts for over three months, and in some instances for more than six months or even years.

The top court observed that most High Courts lack a mechanism for litigants to flag delays in the delivery of judgments to the concerned Bench or the Chief Justice, causing loss of litigants’ faith in the judicial process and defeating the ends of justice.

Disposing of a special leave petition (SLP) concerning a criminal appeal pending since 2008 in the Allahabad High Court, the apex court termed it “extremely shocking and surprising” that the judgment was not delivered for nearly a year from the date when the appeal was heard. The delay was confirmed by the report of the Registrar General of the Allahabad High Court, which noted that despite repeated listings before different Benches, the criminal appeal remained undecided.

The Justice Karol-led Bench directed that a copy of its judgement aiming to reduce delays be circulated to Registrars General of all High Courts for compliance.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiBMC Elections 2026: Mumbai Records 29.96% Voter Turnout Till 1:30 PM

NationalRajasthan Shocker: Man Attempts Self-Immolation After Wife Leaves Home With Four Children in Alwar

BusinessAn In-Depth Conversation with Abhishek Pandey Founder & Director, Charles Walters Council for Innovation and Research On the Attention India Podcast

NashikNashik Municipal Election 2026: Police Lathi Charge in CIDCO Following Cash-for-Votes Allegation

Entertainment“I Survived the Storm Because of Certain People in My Life” Rhea Chakraborty Celebrates Female Friendship

National Realted Stories

NationalCongress targets DMK over power sharing, highlights Kerala‘s UDF model

National78th Army Day Parade: Jaipur hosts event outside cantonment for the first time

NationalMaha local polls: Oppn accuses ruling alliance of money power, blames SEC for mismanagement

NationalPolitical row erupts in Bengal’s Nadia over alleged sex racket near TMC MLA’s residence

NationalKerala Congress (Mani) meet rekindles power shift speculation as Assembly elections near