City
Epaper

SC seeks HCs, states' response on speedy trial in cheque bounce cases

By IANS | Updated: January 19, 2021 20:15 IST

New Delhi, Jan 19 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked various High Courts and states to submit their ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 19 The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked various High Courts and states to submit their response in connection with its suo moto case on expeditious trial in cases where cheques have been dishonoured.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S. A. Bobde said: "Having regard for the importance of matter and administration of justice in states, we are of view that High Courts through their Registrars General and states through DGPs submit response in four weeks."

The bench, also comprising Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran, said that the court took suo motu cognizance of the matter in March 2020, and there was an order to take steps to reduce high pendency of cases relating to dishonoured cheques.

"Amicus curiae have made submissions and NALSA has submitted a report... the RBI has filed a reply to the preliminary report. (On) October 27, 2020, DGP of states were directed to respond with respect to service of summons. Only 7 DGPs have submitted response. Some High Courts have not filed response," the bench noted.

The observation was made by the top court while hearing its suo motu case on expeditious trial of cheque bounce cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The bench noted that DGPs are required to submit their response for the purpose of serving summons.

In case states don't submit their response, the Registrars General of the High Courts and Directors General of Police of states should remain present in the court with necessary authorisation from their government regarding steps to be taken in the matter, the court said.

The top court also noted that in the last hearing, it had asked various High Courts to take this matter seriously, and out of 25 High Courts, 14 have submitted their respective reports and 11 High Courts have submitted the draft scheme, in connection with speedy disposal and trial of cheque bounce cases.

The amicus curiae in the matter submitted before the court that in case of states, which have not responded since March 2020, interim orders can be passed to see whether they respond in two or three weeks.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtVineet SaranNalsa
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

NationalPregnant Sunali Khatoon and Her Son, Deported as Bangladeshis, to Be Brought Back to India, Centre Tells Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump by 2% As Government Reviews AGR Relief Proposal

NationalSupreme Court Orders Nationwide Digital Arrest Cases to Be Transferred to CBI

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Stocks Fall After SC Issues Notice on Plea for Probe Into Alleged ADAG Bank Fraud

National Realted Stories

LifestyleHappy New Year 2026: 10 Hilarious Memes, Jokes, and Messages to Share with Family and Friends for a Joyful Start to the Year

NationalUjjain: Police Officer Saves Hanging Youth’s Life by Performing CPR; Video Surfaces

NationalRajasthan Police to focus on technology and public safety in 2026

NationalGujarat: Over Rs 8,516 crore assistance disbursed to 29.30 lakh farmers affected by unseasonal rains

NationalIndore water tragedy: Over two dozen officials appointed to monitor health services for residents