City
Epaper

'Very seminal issue', SC refers pleas for same-sex marriage to a constitution bench

By IANS | Updated: March 13, 2023 16:40 IST

New Delhi, March 13 The Supreme Court on Monday referred a batch of petitions seeking recognition of same-sex ...

Open in App

New Delhi, March 13 The Supreme Court on Monday referred a batch of petitions seeking recognition of same-sex marriage to a constitution bench, comprising five judges.

The Centre, in an affidavit, contended that legal validation of same-sex marriage will cause "complete havoc" with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country and in accepted societal values. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, stressed that legislative policy recognises marriage as a bond only between a biological man and a biological woman.

The Centre contended that it is for Parliament to decide whether same-sex marriage could be statutorily recognised.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, justice P.S. Narasimha, and justice J.B. Pardiwala said it will invoke Article 145 (3) of the Constitution and have this matter decided by a constitution bench, comprising five judges. "It is a very seminal issue", said the bench, while fixing the matter for hearing on April 18.

The central government has told the Supreme Court that living together as partners and having sexual relationship by same sex individuals, which is decriminalised now, is not comparable with the Indian family unit - a husband, a wife, and children born out of the union - while opposing pleas seeking recognition of same-sex marriage. It stressed that same-sex marriage is not in conformity with societal morality and Indian ethos.

In an affidavit, the central government said the notion of marriage itself necessarily and inevitably presupposes a union between two persons of the opposite sex. This definition is socially, culturally, and legally ingrained into the very idea and concept of marriage and ought not to be disturbed or diluted by judicial interpretation, it added.

The affidavit said the institution of marriage and the family are important social institutions in India that provide for the security, support and companionship of members of society and bear an important role in the rearing of children and their mental and psychological upbringing also.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: indiaparliamentNew DelhiSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-indiaRepublic of indiaIndia india
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

TechnologyWill the Government Have to Offer More Incentives on EVs? NITI Aayog Raises Concerns Over Slow Sales Growth

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

OpinionsWhy is Trump So Upset with India?

MumbaiUniversity of Bristol Chooses Mumbai for Its First Overseas Campus, Set to Open in September 2026

National Realted Stories

NationalArunachal Guv congratulates Kabak Yano for scaling Mount Kilimanjaro

NationalAndhra Pradesh’s NDA govt extends Rs 1 lakh aid for Hajj pilgrims

NationalFPOs need to step up to play crucial role in food processing and increasing farmers income, says MP CM

NationalNo change in status of tribal belts and blocks in Assam: CM Sarma

NationalOdisha: Health Minister urges centre to expedite LoP for MBBS admissions