City
Epaper

Dissenting judgement on demonetisation points out irregularities: Chidambaram on SC verdict

By IANS | Published: January 02, 2023 11:54 AM

New Delhi, Jan 2 After the Supreme Court on Monday upheld the demonetisation exercise of the government, former ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 2 After the Supreme Court on Monday upheld the demonetisation exercise of the government, former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram said the dissent part of the judgement points out irregularities.

Chidambaram in a statement said, "Once the Hon'ble Supreme Court has declared the law, we are obliged to accept it. However, it is necessary to point out that the majority has not upheld the wisdom of the decision; nor has the majority concluded that the stated objectives were achieved. In fact, the majority has steered clear of the question whether the objectives were achieved at all."

"We are happy that the minority judgement has pointed out the illegality and the irregularities in the Demonetisation. It may be only a slap on the wrist of the government, but a welcome slap on the wrist," he added.

He said the dissenting judgement "will rank among the famous dissents recorded in the history of the Hon'ble Supreme Court".

The Supreme Court on Monday affirmed the Central government's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian, and B.V. Nagarathna pronounced the judgment on a clutch of petitions challenging the Centre's 2016 decision to demonetise currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denominations.

Pronouncing the majority judgment, Justice Gavai said that the decision-making process cannot be faulted merely because the proposal emanated from the Central government. The bench said there has to be great restraint in matters of economic policy and the court cannot supplant the wisdom of the executive with its wisdom. Justice Nagarathna differed from the majority view, and delivered a dissenting judgment.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: JanuarySupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Intervenes in Delhi Water Crisis, Orders Himachal Pradesh to Release Surplus Water

BusinessCentre Mandates Self-Declaration Certificate for All New Advertisements from June 18

NationalDelhi Water Crisis: Supreme Court To Hear on Jun 3 Delhi Govt Plea Seeking Direction to Haryana To Release Surplus Water

NationalSupreme Court Refuses Cleric Maulana Kaleem Siddiqui's Plea to Enter Uttar Pradesh for Nephew's Death Anniversary

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea for Extension of Interim Bail

Politics Realted Stories

NationalPM Narendra Modi Swearing-In Ceremony: Only International Leaders Invited, Not INDIA Bloc, Says Congress' Jairam Ramesh

NationalPM Narendra Modi Meets Veteran BJP Leader LK Advani in Delhi Before Staking Claim As Prime Minister for Third Time (Watch Video)

PoliticsShiv Sena (UBT) Claims Several Shinde Sena MLAs Seeking Re-entry; Outlines Condition for Accepting Rebels

NationalKangana Ranaut's 2020 Post on Farmers Protest Resurfaces Amid Alleged Slap Incident by CISF Officer

NationalBJP's Shehzad Poonawalla criticizes Congress, AAP Alliance, Dubs It As 'Selfish friendship'