City
Epaper

'No case is too small for Supreme Court or too big..': SC vs Centre war of words

By IANS | Updated: December 16, 2022 22:10 IST

New Delhi, Dec 16 The friction points between the Central government and the Supreme Court is rolling beyond ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 16 The friction points between the Central government and the Supreme Court is rolling beyond the row over delay in appointment of judges.

Law Minister Kiren Rijiju has minced no words in criticising the judiciary on several issues at various platforms, and the judiciary has also shot back at Central government be it long delay in appointment of judges or underscoring that no case is too big or too small for the Supreme Court as it has to answer the cry of liberty of the citizens.

Recently, Rijiju said in the Parliament that the Supreme Court should not be hearing bail pleas and frivolous PILs amid soaring pendency of cases.

In what appears an indirect response to the minister's criticism, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud on Friday said it is the duty of the apex court to interfere in matters of violation of personal liberty, and judges burn midnight oil for it.

Speaking in Rajya Sabha, the Law Minister appealed to the apex court to take up those cases which are relevant and appropriate, and further added that if the Supreme Court starts hearing bail applications and all frivolous PILs, it will add extra burden on it as a constitutional court.

While releasing a man sentenced to 18 years in jail for electricity theft in 9 separate cases, a bench, headed by Chief Justice Chandrachud and comprising Justice P.S. Narasimha said: "No case is too small for the Supreme Court and no case is too big because we have to answer the call of conscience and the cry of liberty of our citizens, that is why we are here... and these are not one of cases, when you sit here and burn the midnight oil, you realise that everyday there is another one like this..."

The top court it is the duty of the apex court to interfere in matters of violation of personal liberty. Releasing the petitioner, the court, in its order, noted: "The right to personal liberty is an inalienable right. In attending to such grievances, the Supreme Court performs its duty, no more and no less...".

The Union Law Minister, in the Rajya Sabha, had also said that there was a feeling among the people that long court vacations were not very convenient for justice seekers. In a response, the Chief Justice, in a courtroom full of lawyers, on Friday said that "there will be no benches available from tomorrow till January 1".

Friday is the last working day for the Supreme Court and it will reopen after two weeks' winter break on January 2, 2023.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: parliamentKiren RijijuSupreme CourtTwitter rijijuParliament `riksdagSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court levelCanadian supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiAmeet Satam Appointed As Mumbai BJP President Ahead of BMC Polls

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray