City
Epaper

To what extent can court intervene, asks SC on plea for uniform laws

By IANS | Updated: February 20, 2023 22:40 IST

New Delhi, Feb 20 The Supreme Court, hearing a batch of pleas, which included PILs seeking a direction ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 20 The Supreme Court, hearing a batch of pleas, which included PILs seeking a direction to the Centre to make religion and gender-neutral uniform laws governing subjects like marriage, alimony, divorce, and inheritance, on Monday observed that the question is to what extent can the court intervene.

A bench, headed by Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud observed: "The question is to what extent the court can intervene in these matters as the issues fall under the legislative domain."

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, representing a petitioner, said he has a preliminary objection to the PILs filed by advocate Ashwini Upadhyay.

On the other hand, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted: "In principle... as I am concerned, there cannot be any objection to gender-neutral uniform laws applicable to all equally..."

He added that it is for the apex court to examine what can be done on the judicial side.

Sibal asked the bench, also comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and J.B. Pardiwala, to see the prayers made in the petition before the court and added that he can understand if these issues were taken up individually. He stressed that it is for the government to decide if they are willing to make gender and religion-neutral uniform laws and the court should not issue even "a prima facie order" in the matter.

Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing Upadhyay, contested Sibal's submissions and said there is an individual petition, where a Muslim woman said she wanted the personal laws governing her, to be gender neutral.

At this, Sibal said: "These are for the government to decide... If the government wants to take it up, we have no problem."

After hearing arguments, the top court asked the lawyers to prepare a list of prayers made in the petitions and agreed to take them up after four weeks and decide whether it can hear the pleas.

A total of 17 petitions have been filed, which include several PILs and some of the petitions sought a direction for enacting uniform religion and gender-neutral laws on a wide variety of issues.

Upadhyay has filed five separate petitions seeking direction to the Central government to frame religion and gender-neutral uniform laws for divorce, adoption, guardhip, succession, inheritance, maintenance, marriage age, and alimony.

ss/vd

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: indiaNew DelhiKapil SibalSupreme CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westAshwini upadhyayIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

National'Ab Yahi Zindagi Hai': Umar Khalid After Supreme Court Denies Bail

NationalSupreme Court Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in Delhi Riots Case; 5 Others Get Relief

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

National‘Harassing Crores for a Few’: Ex-CEC S.Y. Quraishi Criticises SIR Process at Lokmat National Conclave 2025

NationalLokmat National Conclave 2025: Manoj Jha Flags ‘Freebies Culture’, Says Elections Are No Longer Fair

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis on BJP-Congress Alliance in Maharashtra Civic Body Polls

MaharashtraRaj Thackeray Claims Evidence Against 65 Unopposed Mahayuti Candidates, MNS to Legal Action

MumbaiWho Is Tejasvee Ghosalkar? Shiv Sena UBT Leader and Former Corporator Joins BJP Ahead of BMC Polls

MaharashtraSanjay Raut Says Sena–MNS Already Together No Need Others Permission

MaharashtraBig Jolt to Sharad Pawar as Salil Deshmukh, Son of Anil Deshmukh, Quits NCP-SP