Habib university, Private university in Karachi, Pakistan

Islamabad, April 14 Pakistan's parliament and judiciary have arrived at a standoff as the ruling alliance rejected the eight-member bench constituted to hear the petitions challenging the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, a media report said.The Pakistan Supreme Court, on the other hand, while exercising "anticipatory injunction", stayed the operation on the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure Bill) 2023 aimed at curtailing the powers of the Chief Justice of Pakistan to take suo motu notice and constitute benches, The News reported.The PDM coalition government released a statement, which rejected the eight-member bench, terming it controversial. The allies in the federal government vowed to resist attempts to take away parliament's authority and to interfere in its constitutional scope, The News reported.Earlier this week, the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023 was passed by a joint sitting of parliament after Pakistan President Arif Alvi returned it. Following the development, an eight-member bench was constituted to hear petitions arguing that the "concept, preparation, endorsement and passing of the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023 is an act tainted with mala fide".Subsequently, four separate petitions were filed under Article 184(3) of the Constitution, asking the top court to set aside the bill.The ruling coalition statement termed the development "unprecedented" as the pleas were admitted even before the completion of the legislative process. It said the move was equivalent to sabotaging the credibility of the country's highest court, making the constitutional process of justice "meaningless", The News reported."This bench itself is a testament to the division of the SC, which once again supports the earlier stated position of the ruling parties," the statement said. It said that the ruling alliance considers this an "attack" on parliament and its authority, The News reported.The statement lamented the formation of the "controversial" bench - which does not include any of the judges who raised questions on the powers of the CJP and the non-inclusion of judges from Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. It said that attempts to snatch the authority of parliament and to interfere in its constitutional domain will be resisted. "No compromise will be made on the authority of parliament in the light of the Constitution of Pakistan," the coalition partners maintained.They said that the top court judges - Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail - had in their earlier judgments expressed their objection to the "one-man show", biased and dictatorial behaviour, and the formation of special benches. "With the formation of the eight-member controversial bench, the facts stated in the judgments of these honourable judges have become more clear," the statement said, The News reported.Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Habib UniversityFOLLOW

Habib university, Latest News

Lahore [Pakistan], April 15 : Matt Henry picked up a hat-trick spread across two overs in the first T20I ... ...

Lahore [Pakistan], April 15 : Hundreds of electricity workers held a large protest rally in front of LESCO (Lahore ... ...

Islamabad [Pakistan], April 15 : Pakistan Supreme Court on Friday ordered the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to direct ... ...

Islamabad, April 14 The Pakistan Supreme Court on Friday ordered the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) to release ... ...

London [UK], April 14 : Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) leader Altaf Hussain on Thursday asked Pakists worldwide to become ... ...

Islamabad [Pakistan], April 14 : The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's caretaker government in Pakistan has been facing a severe financial crisis ... ...

Islamabad [Pakistan], April 14 : Pakistan Chief of Army Staff Asim Munir's task is to create unity within the ... ...

Islamabad, April 14 Pakistan's parliament and judiciary have arrived at a standoff as the ruling alliance rejected the ... ...