City
Epaper

East constituency's development transformation: Save

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: November 11, 2024 20:30 IST

Chhatrapati SambhajinagarBJP Mahayuti candidate Atul Save stated that before 2014, securing government funds for development in the eastern ...

Open in App

Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

BJP Mahayuti candidate Atul Save stated that before 2014, securing government funds for development in the eastern constituency's "gunthewari" (unauthorized plot) areas was challenging, leading to delays. After his election, he raised this issue in the Legislative Assembly and obtained funds through former DCM Devendra Fadnavis.

During a campaign rally in Ward No. 92, Vishranti Nagar, on Monday, BJP candidate Atul Save engaged with voters, emphasizing his focus on infrastructure in the "gunthewari" areas. He highlighted securing substantial funds for essential projects, including roads, drainage, water, and electricity. Residents welcomed Save and expressed satisfaction with his development efforts. Save urged voters to give him another chance, promising further solutions to local issues. Pramod Rathod, Nagesh Bhalerao, Tarachand Gaikwad, Himmat Patel and Gayatri Patel were also present.

Open in App

Related Stories

NationalRs 110 crore bridge to come up over Sabarmati river in Gujarat's Anand

NationalED Flags ‘Grave Legal Errors’ in National Herald Ruling, Moves Delhi HC Against Cognisance Refusal

NationalTribal Welfare scam: ED seizes properties valued at Rs 8.07 crore of ex-Karnataka Minister Nagendra

Other SportsDefending champion and newcomers clash for top honours in World 25K

Other SportsWorld Tennis League: Nagal, Shrivalli lead AOS Eagles to dominant win

Aurangabad Realted Stories

AurangabadWomen empowerment awareness programme today

AurangabadBe ready for uncertainty, believe in yourself — P. J. Swamy

AurangabadPrisoner identifies body, local crime branch solves murder in four days

AurangabadDelhi, Mumbai flights cancelled

AurangabadVice-chancellor says “hello… hello…?” robot replies, “your question was not understood”