City
Epaper

SC asks Eknath Shinde faction to show political majority not Legislative majority

By Lokmat English Desk | Updated: March 1, 2023 10:23 IST

Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s faction claimed their right to the Shiv Sena party and said that a legislature ...

Open in App

Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde’s faction claimed their right to the Shiv Sena party and said that a legislature party is integral and organically connected to the political party.

Senior Advocate NK Kaul, appearing for Shinde faction, told a five-judge constitution bench that rival leaders had no faith in then ministry any longer.

Five-judge Constitution bench of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, Justices MR Shah, Krishna Murari, Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha was dealing with the issue related to Maharashtra political crisis.

Justice Narasimha, who was part of the bench asked the Shinde camp to show that they have a political majority and not a legislative majority. Senior Advocate NK Kaul, replied to the court that he would address this issue on Wednesday.

The court also asked several questions to the Shinde camp on various issues, legal aspects on various judgements and sought to know how to separate defection and floor test.

CJI Chandrachud also remarked that if the antecedent reason for a floor test is based on a violation of the tenth schedule, then holding a floor test at that stage will defeat the whole basis and purpose of the tenth schedule. The court also sought to know if they are legitimizing a defection which is otherwise not permissible under the tenth schedule.

Advocate replied that their case is not a case of split under the tenth schedule, they are talking about a rival faction within a party which is dissent and the essence of democracy within a party and they claim that their camp is the Shiv Sena.

Senior Advocate Kaul said that this is a case of internal dissent and the Shinde group is the faction that represents Shiv Sena, which can be decided by the Election Commission of India. As far as floor test is concerned, it is only related to the issue of whether the Chief Minister has the confidence, Kaul said.

The court also noted that the head of the political party did not inform the Governor that they were withdrawing from the alliance of Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA). Kaul replied that 34 out of 55 have written to the Governor saying they had no faith in this government.

Uddhav Thackeray faction had earlier submitted that the opposite camp has no defence under the tenth schedule. A five-judge Constitution bench was hearing a batch of petitions filed by rival factions Uddhav Thackeray and Chief Minister Eknath Shinde in relation to the Maharashtra political crisis.

Tags: Supreme CourtShinde factionMaharashtra Political Crisis
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalJustice BR Gavai Appointed as 52nd Chief Justice of India, Oath on May 14

NationalSexually Explicit Content on OTT, Social Media: Supreme Court Issues Notice to Centre

NationalPuja Khedkar Case: Supreme Court Directs Ex-IAS Probationer to Appear Before Police on May 2

NationalViral Video Claims Supreme Court Parking Area Is Filled With Luxury Cars of Top Lawyers

NationalWaqf Act Hearing: Supreme Court Directs Centre To File Response Within a Week, Next Hearing on May 5

Maharashtra Realted Stories

MaharashtraBhendwal Bhavishyvani 2025: Strong Defence, Rain Surplus in July–September; Farmers Likely Face Crop Disease

MaharashtraMHADA Konkan Board to Sell 13,395 Unsold Flats Under First-Come-First-Serve Scheme; Applicants Can Now Choose Flats Online

MumbaiMumbai: Couple Cheats Three Members of a Family of Over Rs 1 Crore on Pretext of Investment

MumbaiMumbai: Widow of Deceased Police Officer Cheated of Rs 50 Lakh on Pretext of Government Quarters; Case Registered in Charkop

MumbaiMumbai Local Train Update: Services to Run on Holiday Schedule on Maharashtra Day 2025, Some Likely to Be Suspended or Short-Terminated