City
Epaper

No permission to record compromise in non-compoundable offences: SC

By IANS | Updated: July 24, 2019 20:45 IST

The Supreme Court has said that "no permission can be granted to record a compromise between the parties" in non-compoundable offences.

Open in App

The observation by a bench of Justices R. Banumathi and A.S. Bopanna came while upholding Punjab and Haryana High Court's order which has convicted one Manjit Singh under the sections 307 (attempt to murder) and 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) of Indian Penal Code.

However, the bench also said while sentencing the accused for a non-compoundable offence, the compromise entered into between the parties is indeed a relevant circumstance for considering the quantum of sentence.

Thereafter, the bench reduced the sentence to the period undergone by Manjit Singh, who has already served seventeen months of imprisonment.

The top court said: "Taking note of the compromise entered into between the parties and considering the relationship of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case and also the sentence undergone by the appellant-accused (Manjit Singh), the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon the appellant under Sections 307 and 324 IPC is reduced from five years/two years to the period already undergone by him."

The bench noted that during the pendency of the appeal filed by Manjit Singh in the apex court, the parties entered into a compromise.

"Section 307 IPC is a non-compoundable offence. No permission can be granted to record the compromise between the parties," the bench said in its July 22 order.

"In our considered opinion, it would not be appropriate to order compounding of an offence not compoundable under the code ignoring and keeping aside statutory provisions."

The court further added: "In our judgment, however, limited submission of the learned counsel for the appellant deserves consideration that while imposing substantive sentence, the factum of compromise between the parties is indeed a relevant circumstance which the court may keep in mind."

Manjit Singh had challenged the high court order which has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for five years after convicting him under the charges dealing with attempt to murder.

Punjab Police had lodged a first information report against Manjit Singh and his brother on the complaint of Hardip Singh in June 2001.

Hardip Singh had alleged that on June 4, 2001, when he was returning to his village Baghiari in Punjab from a bus stop on his scooter, Manjit Singh and his brother Ranjit Singh, armed with a knife, attacked him. Hardip Singh suffered injuries on his right thigh.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Manjit SinghRanjit SinghpunjabR Banumathi
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalJalandhar Hospital Tragedy: Oxygen Supply Drop Leads to Death of Three Patients, Inquiry Underway

NationalPunjab Horror: Minor Girl Raped Abducted in Moving Car By 2 Unknown Men in Mohali , Complaint Filed

NationalPunjab Road Accident: 6, Including Four College Students, Killed in Two Separate Mishaps in Bathinda and Hoshiarpur

NationalFauja Singh Hit-and-Run Case: NRI Amritpal Singh Dhillon Arrested in Death of 114-Year-Old Marathon Runner in Punjab

NationalGolden Temple in Amritsar Receives Bomb Threat via Email; Security Tightened, Police Launch Probe (VIDEO)

National Realted Stories

NationalPhilippines President Marcos begins 5-day India visit today to boost defence, trade ties

NationalCM Rekha Gupta to table two CAG reports in Delhi Assembly today during monsoon session

NationalGovt and agency should find conspirators of Malegaon bomb blast: Bhaiyaji Joshi

NationalUP Police telecom gets 1,494 new recruits as CM Yogi hands over appointment letters

NationalCM Mohan Majhi announces ex gratia for 6 Odia migrants killed in Andhra quarry blast