City
Epaper

Police should not automatically arrest husband or his relatives in cruelty cases: SC

By IANS | Updated: August 1, 2023 15:10 IST

New Delhi, Aug 1 In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court has reiterated that the police should not ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Aug 1 In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court has reiterated that the police should not automatically arrest a husband or his relatives when an FIR alleging cruelty is lodged at the instance of a married woman.

A bench comprising Justices S. Ravindra Bhat and Aravind Kumar said that the police officers should satisfy themselves about the necessity for

arrest under the parameters laid down in Section 41 CrPC.

It directed High Courts and DGPs (Director General of Police) in all states to issue circulars containing guidelines laid down by the apex court to all

lower courts and police authorities within eight weeks.

In Arnesh Kumar judgment, the apex court passed a slew of directions to prevent police officers from arresting the accused unnecessarily. It

instructed police officers to not automatically arrest when a case under Section 498-A IPC or under Dowry Prohibition Act is registered and

clarified that such direction will also apply to cases where offence is punishable with up to seven or less years of imprisonment.

“Affidavits of compliance shall be filed before this court within ten weeks by all the states and High Courts, through their Registrars,” the Supreme

Court ordered.

The top court was hearing a special leave petition filed against denial of anticipatory bail and a direction passed by the Jharkhand High Court asking

the husband to surrender before the lower court to seek regular bail in relation to dowry case lodged by the wife.

It was argued on behalf of the appellant husband that an arrest can be made does not mandate that it ought to be made in every case and an accused can be taken into custody only if the Investigating Officer believes that he or she may abscond or disobey summons.

“Ordinarily bail ought to be granted and that in serious cases….which involve allegations relating to offences carrying long sentences or other

special offences, the court should be circumspect and careful in exercising discretion (to grant bail),” said the Supreme Court while allowing bail to

the appellant.

--IANS

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: congresspitrodadelhimodideepikabjpwest-bengaldeepika-padukoneajay-devgnthakur
Open in App

Related Stories

Social Viral'Flight Le Leta': Netizens React as Mumbai-Delhi Tejas Rajdhani Express Ticket Costs Rs 5,500

EntertainmentRandeep Hooda and Lin Laishram Join Archery Premier League as Co-Owners of Delhi's Prithviraj Yodhas

EntertainmentRani Mukerji Breaks Silence on Work Hour Debate Amid Deepika Padukone’s Kalki 2898 AD and Spirit Row

NationalDelhi: Food Delivery Worker Bullied in Narela, Drunken Customer Misbehaves with Police

NationalZubeen Garg Death Probe: Festival Organiser Shyamkanu Mahanta and Manager Siddhartha Sharma Arrested in Delhi, Brought to Guwahati

National Realted Stories

NationalUncertainties brew over how long Bengal govt employees will remain under 6th Pay Commission

NationalSP delegation leaves for Bareilly over ‘I Love Muhammad’ row; heavy police deployment stops leaders

NationalCEC Gyanesh Kumar begins his two-day Bihar visit to review poll preparedness

NationalSenior Congress leader Rameshwar Dudi passes away; funeral in Bikaner today

NationalHeavy rain forecast for 14 TN districts, fishermen advised to stay ashore