City
Epaper

SC reserves verdict on plea against delimitation commission in J-K

By ANI | Updated: December 1, 2022 20:35 IST

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on a plea challenging the government's decision to constitute the delimitation ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on a plea challenging the government's decision to constitute the delimitation commission for redrawing the assembly and Lok Sabha constituencies in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul reserved the judgement after hearing all the parties in the case.

The Centre and Election Commission of India (ECI) have defended the decision to conduct the delimitation exercise which extended the number of assembly seats in Jammu and Kashmir.

The apex court was hearing a plea of two Srinagar residents Haji Abdul Gani Khan and Dr Mohammad Ayub Mattoo saying that this delimitation exercise was carried out contrary to the scheme of the constitution, and alteration of boundaries and inclusion of extended areas could not be done.

The challenge is about the delimitation pursuant to the notifications of March 6, 2020, and March 3, 2021.

The plea sought a declaration that the increase in the number of seats from 107 to 114 (including 24 seats in Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir) in Jammu and Kashmir is ultra vires the Constitutional Provisions such as Articles 81, 82, 170, 330, and 332 and Statutory Provisions, particularly under Section 63 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019.

It said that while Article 170 of the Constitution of India provides that the next delimitation in the country will be taken up after 2026 then why has the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir been singled out?

The plea said that the last Delimitation Commission was set up on July 12, 2002, in the exercise of powers conferred by Section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002, after the 2001 Census to carry out the exercise throughout the country and the commission had issued guidelines and methodology for the Delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary Constituencies vide letter dated July 5, 2004, along with the Constitutional and Legal Provisions.

It sought to declare the notification dated March 6, 2020, constituting the delimitation commission to take up delimitation in the Union Territory Jammu and Kashmir and the states- Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Nagaland by the Centre and consequential omission of Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur and Nagaland from the process of delimitation vide., notification dated March 3, 2021, and conducting delimitation only for Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir is unconstitutional as it amounts to classification and violates Article 14.

( With inputs from ANI )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: srinagarjammuSanjay Kishan KaulSupreme CourtLok SabhaLok sabha om birlaSanjay kishanUpper house of the parliamentSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSangli Lok Sabha Twist: Wrestler-Turned-Politician Chandrahar Patil Joins Shinde-Led Shiv Sena After Fallout with Thackeray Camp

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

NationalPakistan Violates Ceasefire: BSF Trooper Killed, 7 Injured in Jammu Shelling

National Realted Stories

NationalCM Stalin to inaugurate 50 water vending machines in Chennai today

NationalPM Narendra Modi Leaves for Croatia After Concluding ‘Productive’ Canada Visit

NationalMP: Congress workers clash during ‘Sangathan Srijan’ meeting in Bhopal

NationalBengal: Two more accused arrested in Murshidabad violence case

NationalBihar Minister Santosh Suman accuses Lalu Yadav of insulting Dalits, demands apology