City
Epaper

Delhi govt vs Centre: SC agrees to hear dispute on control of services

By IANS | Updated: February 15, 2022 13:50 IST

New Delhi, Feb 15 The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear the dispute between the central and ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 15 The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear the dispute between the central and the Delhi government in connection with the control over administrative services in the national capital.

Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the Delhi government, mentioned the matter for urgent listing before a bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana. The bench, also comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Hima Kohli, scheduled the matter for hearing on March 3.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice A.K. Sikri and comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan of the apex court, in February 2019, delivered a split verdict on the question of powers of the Delhi government and the Centre over services and referred the matter to a 3-judge bench.

Justice Bhushan held that the Delhi government had no power over 'services', while Justice Sikri, took the middle path.

The Delhi government had contended that the Centre had excluded the elected government in the capital from exercising any administrative control over the officers. The government further argued that officers are continuing to act on the orders of the central government through the Lieutenant Governor (LG).

Justice Sikri concluded that files on the transfers and postings of officers in the rank of Secretary, Head of Department and Joint Secretary could be directly submitted to the Lieutenant-Governor (L-G). Justice Bhushan said Entry 41 of the State List in the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution, dealing with 'State Public Services,' was outside the purview of the Delhi Legislative Assembly.

Justice Sikri said for DANICS (Delhi, Andaman Nicobar Islands Civil Service) cadre, the files could be processed through the Council of Ministers led by the Chief Minister to the L-G. Justice Sikri had said the situation in Delhi was "peculiar."

The February 2019 judgment followed a Constitution Bench verdict in July 2018, where the bench held that L-G was bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers of the National Capital Territory government.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Justices a.s. bopannaSupreme CourtAshok BhushanHima kohliSeveral supreme court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalSupreme Court Issues Notice to Bihar and Delhi Governments Over Minor Girl's Plea Against Forced Child Marriage

NationalThane-Ghodbunder Tunnel: Supreme Court Accepts Maharashtra Govt's Decision to Scrap Rs 14,000 Crore Bid, Big Relief to L&T

NationalCryptocurrency Needs To Be Regulated, Banning Not an Option, Says Supreme Court

MaharashtraPune Porsche Crash: One Year On, 9 Accused Still Behind Bars; Justice Still in Motion

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala

MaharashtraNCP Leader Suraj Chavan Shares Alleged Black Magic Video of Shiv Sena Leader Bharat Gogawle Amid Row Over Raigad Guardian Post

MaharashtraMaharashtra Politics: Raj Thackeray Meets CM Devendra Fadnavis at Taj Lands End Amid Rumours of MNS–Sena UBT Alliance

MaharashtraMaharashtra Municipal Elections 2025: Mahayuti Alliance to Contest Civic Body Polls Together, Says CM Devendra Fadnavis