City
Epaper

Don't want to use word, but legislature has been dumb: SC

By IANS | Updated: April 5, 2022 22:05 IST

New Delhi, April 5 The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed discontent at the fact that the cases either ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 5 The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed discontent at the fact that the cases either before a lower court or tribunal, eventually ended up before it.

A bench headed by Justice K.M. Joseph orally observed: "We do not want to use the word, but legislature has been dumb in this regard. We don't want to use the word but that is the word."

It noted that that every case ultimately ends up before the top court, as it highlighted that the legislature was not correct in providing statutory appeals against orders of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) directly to the Supreme Court.

The top court made this observation during the hearing of a plea by the Madhya Pradesh High Court Bar Association, challenging Section 3 of the NGT Act, in connection with the establishment of the tribunal. The plea has been filed through advocate Mrigank Prabhakar.

The bench queried the counsel representing the petitioner whether the Act excludes the jurisdiction of the high courts under Articles 226 and 227.

Attorney General K.K. Venugopal, representing the Centre, submitted before the bench that it was legislature's prerogative to provide for statutory appeals to the apex court. He said that the Tribunal Reforms Act was brought but it was struck down, and later an ordinance was brought, which is also under challenge.

The petitioner's counsel submitted that there is no explicit exclusion, rather has an implicit exclusion and this is by way of direct appeal in the top court. The AG submitted that tribunals are highly specialised, in matters of electricity, telecom, copyright etc.

Venugopal emphasised that specialisation in these areas makes tribunals equal to the high courts and they cannot be termed inferior to the high courts.

After hearing arguments, the bench, also comprising Justice Hrishikesh Roy, reserved judgment in the matter.

"Judgment reserved. Parties may file written submissions within five days," it said.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtNational Green TribunalHrishikesh RoySeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls as Supreme Court Postpones AGR Dues Hearing to Oct 6

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Falls By 6% Ahead of Supreme Court Hearing On Rs, 9450 Crore AGR Dues

NationalDelhi Metro Tragedy: Woman Falls or Jumps From Supreme Court Station; Investigation Underway

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise by 1%: Telecom Stock Jumps 15% in One Month After Government Signals Support on AGR Dues

NationalSupreme Court Rejects Jacqueline Fernandez’s Plea to Dismiss Rs 215 Crore Money Laundering Charges Linked to Sukesh Chandrashekhar

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiAmeet Satam Appointed As Mumbai BJP President Ahead of BMC Polls

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray