City
Epaper

Inter-faith marriages: SC allows HP, MP to be made parties in the matter

By IANS | Updated: February 17, 2021 18:07 IST

New Delhi, Feb 17 The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed an NGO to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 17 The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed an NGO to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as parties in a pending matter challenging their controversial laws regulating conversions due to inter-faith marriages.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S. A. Bobde and comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian also permitted Muslim body Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind to become a party in the matter. Advocate Ejaz Maqbool, representing the Muslim body, contended before the bench that a large number of Muslims men are being harassed under these laws in various parts of the country.

Senior advocate C.U. Singh, representing the NGO Citizens for Justice and Peace, urged the top court to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as parties in the matter. Singh said these states have also framed laws on the lines of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.

Last month, the top court had agreed to examine the controversial laws of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, which aimed at regulating religious conversions due to interfaith marriages. However, the top court had declined to stay these laws and sought response from the state governments in the matter.

The petitions filed by advocate Vishal Thakre, the NGO and others have challenged the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018 which regulate religious conversions of interfaith marriages.

The controversial UP ordinance is connected with not only inter-faith marriages but all religious conversions and lays down elaborate procedures for any person who wishes to convert to another religion.

The Uttarakhand law entails two-year jail term to any person or persons found guilty of religious conversion through force or "allurement", which could be cash, in kind of employment, or material benefit.

In its application Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind has raised the issue of fundamental rights of Muslim youth who are being allegedly targeted by using the ordinance.

 

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Justices a.s. bopannaVishal thakreSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

MumbaiBadlapur Encounter Case: Supreme Court Stays FIR Against Thane Police in Akshay Shinde Death

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraPower Struggle in Maharashtra? Gulabrao Deokar, Satish Patil Join Ajit Pawar’s NCP Amid Mahayuti Rift

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill