City
Epaper

Inter-faith marriages: SC allows HP, MP to be made parties in the matter

By IANS | Updated: February 17, 2021 18:07 IST

New Delhi, Feb 17 The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed an NGO to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Feb 17 The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed an NGO to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as parties in a pending matter challenging their controversial laws regulating conversions due to inter-faith marriages.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S. A. Bobde and comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian also permitted Muslim body Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind to become a party in the matter. Advocate Ejaz Maqbool, representing the Muslim body, contended before the bench that a large number of Muslims men are being harassed under these laws in various parts of the country.

Senior advocate C.U. Singh, representing the NGO Citizens for Justice and Peace, urged the top court to make Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as parties in the matter. Singh said these states have also framed laws on the lines of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand.

Last month, the top court had agreed to examine the controversial laws of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, which aimed at regulating religious conversions due to interfaith marriages. However, the top court had declined to stay these laws and sought response from the state governments in the matter.

The petitions filed by advocate Vishal Thakre, the NGO and others have challenged the constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018 which regulate religious conversions of interfaith marriages.

The controversial UP ordinance is connected with not only inter-faith marriages but all religious conversions and lays down elaborate procedures for any person who wishes to convert to another religion.

The Uttarakhand law entails two-year jail term to any person or persons found guilty of religious conversion through force or "allurement", which could be cash, in kind of employment, or material benefit.

In its application Jamiat Ulama-I-Hind has raised the issue of fundamental rights of Muslim youth who are being allegedly targeted by using the ordinance.

 

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Justices a.s. bopannaVishal thakreSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentActor Darshan Arrested From Hosakerehalli Residence After Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Renukaswamy Murder Case

EntertainmentZara Khan Urges Supreme Court to Reconsider Order on Removing Stray Dogs from Delhi-NCR

Social Viral'His Name Is Dogesh': Dog Spotted in Supreme Court Premises During Stray Dog Hearing, Netizens Share Hilarious Jokes

MaharashtraMarathi Manoos Once Called Outsider, Now Being Marginalized Again: Uddhav Thackeray

NationalLawyer Slaps Animal Activist Outside Supreme Court Amid Stray Dog Relocation Row; Clash Caught on Camera (VIDEO)

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala