City
Epaper

'Like Jarasandha, fake currency, terror financing should be cut into pieces', Centre to SC on DeMo

By IANS | Updated: December 5, 2022 23:20 IST

New Delhi, Dec 5 The Centre on Monday contended before the Supreme Court that even if the initial ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Dec 5 The Centre on Monday contended before the Supreme Court that even if the initial objective of the 2016 demonetisation exercise was not achieved, the entire policy cannot be invalidated, adding that three evils black money, fake currency and terror financing are like 'Jarasandha' (an antagonist in the Mahabharata) which should be cut into pieces.

Attorney General (AG) R. Venkataramani, representing the Centre, contended before a five-judge Constitution bench headed by Justice S.A. Nazeer that the court should take a macro view of the government's endeavours to counter fake currency, black money and terror financing, rather than looking at demonetisation as a stand-alone measure.

The AG said the government is duty-bound to address the three evils.

Referring to the three problems, Venkataramani said, "They are like Jarasandha. You have to cut them into pieces. If you don't, they will always be alive."

He added that for more than a decade, the Centre and the RBI have been looking at these issues.

The AG emphasised that the notification failing to achieve its objectives was not enough to strike down a law.

And, on the aspect of judicial review of an economic policy, he said the court only may determine if there is a rational nexus with the object sought to be achieved through the means and any other test would impinge on the freedom of the legislature.

The bench also comprising justices B.R. Gavai, A.S. Bopanna, V. Ramasubramanian and B.V. Nagarathna is hearing a clutch of petitions challenging the demonetisation decision of the government.

The AG added that even the five-year plan has targets and some targets are met while some are not. Does the target become bad only for this reason, he asked.

The Centre said the procedure adopted by the government as well as by the RBI was in consonance with the law.

The top court is likely to continue hearing the matter on Tuesday.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: AgSupreme CourtSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSupreme Court Clears Way for Local Body Elections in Maharashtra, Retains Pre-2022 OBC Quota

Maharashtra"Local Body Elections Long Overdue, We Are Fully Prepared", Sanjay Raut on SC Order

MaharashtraMaharashtra Local Body Polls 2025: Supreme Court Asks State Commission to Conduct Elections Within 4 Months

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraPower Struggle in Maharashtra? Gulabrao Deokar, Satish Patil Join Ajit Pawar’s NCP Amid Mahayuti Rift

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill