City
Epaper

'Misconceived plea': SC rejects challenge to PM CARES Fund

By IANS | Updated: April 13, 2020 23:45 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

Open in App

New Delhi, April 13 The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde did not agree to submissions made by Sharma that this fund has been created without following schemes under Articles 266 and 267 (which deals with contingency and Consolidate Funds) of the Constitution.

The Prime Minister is the ex-officio chairman of the fund, and has three ministers as ex-officio trustees - Defence, Home and Finance. The plea had also sought a court-monitored Special Investigation Team to probe into the setting of this Fund, which was set up on March 28.

In another matter, the Supreme Court also refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre, state governments and Union Territories to nationalize all healthcare facilities and connected entities till the coronavirus outbreak is contained.

A bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and S Ravindra Bhat, while hearing the matter through video conferencing, said the court cannot pass a direction sought in the plea. It said the first prayer in the petition is misconceived and the petition is dismissed. On the second prayer, which sought direction to provide free coronavirus test and treatment for coronavirus, the bench said it had already examined another petition having common issues.

The court then tagged this petition with another pending matter.

The bench told the petitioner it cannot nationalise hospitals, as the government has already taken over some hospitals. The plea claimed India does not have sufficient public health care infrastructure to fight back coronavirus pandemic.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: indiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtAshok BhushanThe new delhi municipal council
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

NationalWho Is Harish Rana? Man in Coma for 12 Years Gets Right to Die After Supreme Court Order

NationalAhmedabad Traffic Update for India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup Final: Check Road Closures and Alternate Routes Near Narendra Modi Stadium

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsRajya Sabha Chairman, Lok Sabha Speaker reject opposition notices seeking removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar

PoliticsStrong booth network is party's real strength: BJP leader Sanjay Tandon

PoliticsBaramati not just constituency, but Dada's heartbeat; every Baramatikar matters: Sunetra Ajit Pawar

Politics"No development in state for past 10 years": Priyanka Gandhi targets Pinarayi Vijayan ahead of Keralam assembly polls

PoliticsAndhra Pradesh emerging as dynamic hub for industrial development: Governor Abdul Nazeer