City
Epaper

'Misconceived plea': SC rejects challenge to PM CARES Fund

By IANS | Updated: April 13, 2020 23:45 IST

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

Open in App

New Delhi, April 13 The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde did not agree to submissions made by Sharma that this fund has been created without following schemes under Articles 266 and 267 (which deals with contingency and Consolidate Funds) of the Constitution.

The Prime Minister is the ex-officio chairman of the fund, and has three ministers as ex-officio trustees - Defence, Home and Finance. The plea had also sought a court-monitored Special Investigation Team to probe into the setting of this Fund, which was set up on March 28.

In another matter, the Supreme Court also refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre, state governments and Union Territories to nationalize all healthcare facilities and connected entities till the coronavirus outbreak is contained.

A bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and S Ravindra Bhat, while hearing the matter through video conferencing, said the court cannot pass a direction sought in the plea. It said the first prayer in the petition is misconceived and the petition is dismissed. On the second prayer, which sought direction to provide free coronavirus test and treatment for coronavirus, the bench said it had already examined another petition having common issues.

The court then tagged this petition with another pending matter.

The bench told the petitioner it cannot nationalise hospitals, as the government has already taken over some hospitals. The plea claimed India does not have sufficient public health care infrastructure to fight back coronavirus pandemic.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: indiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtAshok BhushanThe new delhi municipal council
Open in App

Related Stories

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Stocks Fall After SC Issues Notice on Plea for Probe Into Alleged ADAG Bank Fraud

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump 3% Today as Telecom Stock Rises 75% in Three Months Amid Strong Market Momentum

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Rise 2% as Global Brokerage Sees 36% Upside, Maintains ‘Buy’ Rating

BusinessVodafone Idea Share Price Jumps 5% in a Single Day After Strong Q2 Results; Stock Hits ₹10

MumbaiMumbai: 90,000 Stray Dogs, Only 8 Shelters - City Faces Crunch After SC Relocation Order

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days

NationalBJP Candidate Satish Kumar Leading Over Tejashwi Yadav in Raghopur Assembly Constituency

NationalBihar Assembly Election Results 2025: Tejashwi Yadav Leads, Tej Pratap Trails in Early Trends

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

MaharashtraWho Is Akshaya Naik? Shetkari Kamgar Paksha Named Mayoral Candidate of Alibag