City
Epaper

'Misconceived plea': SC rejects challenge to PM CARES Fund

By IANS | Published: April 13, 2020 11:29 PM

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

Open in App

New Delhi, April 13 The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain a plea seeking quashing the decision to set up the PM CARES Fund, where people can contribute to money amid the outbreak of coronavirus to provide relief to those affected in the country. The apex court termed the plea, filed by advocate M.L. Sharma, "misconceived" and dismissed it.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde did not agree to submissions made by Sharma that this fund has been created without following schemes under Articles 266 and 267 (which deals with contingency and Consolidate Funds) of the Constitution.

The Prime Minister is the ex-officio chairman of the fund, and has three ministers as ex-officio trustees - Defence, Home and Finance. The plea had also sought a court-monitored Special Investigation Team to probe into the setting of this Fund, which was set up on March 28.

In another matter, the Supreme Court also refused to entertain a plea seeking direction to the Centre, state governments and Union Territories to nationalize all healthcare facilities and connected entities till the coronavirus outbreak is contained.

A bench comprising Justice Ashok Bhushan and S Ravindra Bhat, while hearing the matter through video conferencing, said the court cannot pass a direction sought in the plea. It said the first prayer in the petition is misconceived and the petition is dismissed. On the second prayer, which sought direction to provide free coronavirus test and treatment for coronavirus, the bench said it had already examined another petition having common issues.

The court then tagged this petition with another pending matter.

The bench told the petitioner it cannot nationalise hospitals, as the government has already taken over some hospitals. The plea claimed India does not have sufficient public health care infrastructure to fight back coronavirus pandemic.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: indiaNew DelhiSupreme CourtAshok BhushanThe new delhi municipal council
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Water Crisis: Supreme Court To Hear on Jun 3 Delhi Govt Plea Seeking Direction to Haryana To Release Surplus Water

NationalLok Sabha Election Results 2024: I.N.D.I.A Bloc Govt Is Going To Be Formed on June 4, Says Rahul Gandhi

NationalNew Delhi Railway Station Alert: Suspected Objects Found in Garbage Area, No Explosive Threat Detected, Police Says

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024: I.N.D.I.A Bloc To Get Decisive Mandate Due to Positive Campaign, Says Jairam Ramesh

InternationalChina Deploys J-20 Stealth Fighters Near India’s LAC Amid Ongoing Tensions

Politics Realted Stories

NationalArvind Kejriwal To Surrender on June 2: BJP Leader Vijay Goel Brings Ambulance for Delhi CM (Watch Video)

PoliticsManmohan Singh Accuses PM Modi of Diminishing the Prestige of the PM's Office: 'No Prime Minister Has Used Such Hateful Language

PoliticsChirag Paswan Criticizes Rahul Gandhi's Promise to Scrap Agniveer Scheme: 'Those Who Care About Mutton Parties Will Not Understand'

PoliticsLok Sabha Election 2024: Prime Minister Modi Urges First-Time Voters in Varanasi to Exercise Their Democratic Right

NationalOdisha CM Naveen Patnaik Responds to PM Modi's Call for Health Probe, Says 'He Should Have Called Me' (Watch Video)