City
Epaper

SC agrees to examine plea against validity of sedition law

By IANS | Updated: July 14, 2021 13:05 IST

New Delhi, July 14 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a fresh plea by Mysuru-based Major ...

Open in App

New Delhi, July 14 The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine a fresh plea by Mysuru-based Major General S.G. Vombatkere challenging the constitutional validity of Section 124A (sedition) of the IPC with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.

A bench headed by Justice N.V. Ramana and comprising of Justices A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy told advocate P.B. Suresh, representing the petitioner, to serve a copy of the petition to the Attorney General. The bench will conduct hearing on the matter on July 15.

On July 12, another bench of the Supreme Court had sought response from the Centre and Attorney General on a plea challenging the constitutionality of the offence of sedition under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code.

A bench comprising Justices U.U. Lalit and Ajay Rastogi was hearing a writ petition filed by two journalists, each from Manipur and Chhattisgarh, challenging the constitutionality of the offence of sedition. The top court had issued notice to the Attorney General (AG) on the petition on April 30. During the hearing on Wednesday, AG K.K. Venugopal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, urged the top court to grant two weeks to file their responses. The bench granted them two weeks' time and adjourned the matter for further hearing on July 27.

The main writ petition, filed through Advocate Tanima Kishore and drawn by advocate Siddharth Seem on behalf of the petitioner journalists Kishorechandra Wangkhemcha and Kanhaiya Lal Shukla, argues the impugned section clearly infringes the fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India which guarantees that "all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression".

"The restriction imposed by the section is an unreasonable one, and therefore does not constitute a permissible restriction in terms of Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Hence this petition is filed to humbly pray that Section 124-A be declared unconstitutional and void by this Hon'ble Court and be struck out of the Indian Penal Code", said the plea.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: indiaNew DelhiIPCAjay RastogiSupreme CourtHrishikesh RoyThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westIndiUk-india
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentActor Darshan Arrested From Hosakerehalli Residence After Supreme Court Cancels Bail in Renukaswamy Murder Case

EntertainmentZara Khan Urges Supreme Court to Reconsider Order on Removing Stray Dogs from Delhi-NCR

Social Viral'His Name Is Dogesh': Dog Spotted in Supreme Court Premises During Stray Dog Hearing, Netizens Share Hilarious Jokes

MaharashtraMarathi Manoos Once Called Outsider, Now Being Marginalized Again: Uddhav Thackeray

NationalLawyer Slaps Animal Activist Outside Supreme Court Amid Stray Dog Relocation Row; Clash Caught on Camera (VIDEO)

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala