City
Epaper

Take clear stand on lifting export ban on iron ore, SC to Karnataka

By IANS | Updated: April 18, 2022 22:00 IST

New Delhi, April 18 The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Karnataka government to take a clear stand ...

Open in App

New Delhi, April 18 The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Karnataka government to take a clear stand on the plea by miners seeking permission to export iron ore extracted in mines of Chitradurga, Tumakuru, and Ballari.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing NGO Samaj Parivartan Samudaya, contended before a bench headed by Chief Justice N.V. Ramana that there was no need to allow exports, as the Steel Ministry said iron ore was not surplus, and cited the 2013 judgment, former Lokayukta Justice Santosh Hegde's report, as well as the Parliamentary panel findings.

He submitted that only finished steel should be exported, as this is capable of generating employment opportunities.

Additional Solicitor General K.M. Nataraj, representing the Centre, submitted that under the extant policy of the government, there is no bar on export of iron ore.

Nataraj also submitted that the issue of deficit in production of iron ore can't be raised in case of Karnataka mines only.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, representing mine lease holders, contended that relief prayed in the PIL by the NGO has already been achieved and the Karnataka mining firms can't be punished endlessly. He insisted that the environmental damage has already been recouped.

The bench, also comprising Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli, was informed that a Cabinet meeting has been scheduled to decide on the export of iron ore issue.

The top court told Karnataka's Additional Advocate General Nikhil Goel to inform it of the state's stand within a day. After hearing detailed arguments, the top court reserved the order on the plea by the miners.

Earlier, the Mines and Steel Ministries expressed support for the demand for lifting the ban on export of minerals from Karnataka's three districts, while the steel manufacturers body have opposed it.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Steel ministrySupreme CourtHima kohliNikhil goelSeveral supreme courtSupreme court and high court level
Open in App

Related Stories

EntertainmentSamay Raina and Four Others Summoned by Supreme Court Over Mocking Disabled Individuals

NationalSC Rejects Red Fort Claim by Woman Posing as Mughal Heir: ‘Why Not Fatehpur Sikri Too?’

MumbaiBadlapur Encounter Case: Supreme Court Stays FIR Against Thane Police in Akshay Shinde Death

ThaneBadlapur School Sexual Assault Case: FIR Still Pending as HC Deadline Passes

MaharashtraUPSC Cheating Case: Pooja Khedkar Denies Allegations of Exam Fraud, Name Change and Fake Disability Certificate

Politics Realted Stories

MaharashtraPower Struggle in Maharashtra? Gulabrao Deokar, Satish Patil Join Ajit Pawar’s NCP Amid Mahayuti Rift

Maharashtra'Unity Not Just for Elections': MNS Leader Sandeep Deshpande on Possible Thackeray Alliance

PoliticsMurshidabad Violence: Shehzad Poonawalla Slams Yusuf Pathan Over Tea Post, Says, “As Hindus Get Slaughtered…”

PoliticsTamil Nadu Assembly Elections 2026: BJP-AIADMK Join Hands, Palaniswami To Lead Alliance, Says Amit Shah

Politics‘No Injustice to Muslims’: Shiv Sena Leader Manisha Kayande Slams Opponents of Waqf Amendment Bill