City
Epaper

SC issues notice on plea to transfer funds from PM CARES to NDR Fund

By IANS | Published: June 17, 2020 8:22 PM

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on a PIL seeking to transfer funds from PM ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on a PIL seeking to transfer funds from PM CARES Fund to National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF).

A bench comprising Justices Ashok Bhushan, Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.R. Shah asked the Centre to file a response within four weeks. The Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) in the plea claimed that in the backdrop of Covid-19 pandemic, NDRF is not being utilized by the authorities, and establishing the PM CARES Fund is outside the scope of the Disaster Management Act.

The petitioner argued that the entire fund collected in the PM CARES Fund to date may be directed to be transferred to the NDRF.

"The Centre may be directed to utilize NDRF for the purpose of providing assistance in the fight against Covid-19 pandemic in compliance with Section 46 of the DM Act, all the contributions/grants from individuals and institutions shall be credited to the NDRF in terms of Section 46(1)(b) rather than to PM CARES Fund and all the funds collected in the PM Cares Fund to date may be directed to be transferred to the NDRF", said the PIL.

The petition argued that there is need to put in place a broader and well- thought out national plan outlining inter alia a detailed coordination mechanism between Centre and states.

"Section 11 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "DM Act") makes it mandatory for a national plan to be drawn up for disaster management for whole of the country, but currently, there is no such national plan in place to deal with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic", argued the plea.

The petitioner also cited lack of transparency associated with PM CARES Fund, as it cannot be audited by CAG. And, it is also outside the purview of RTI, added the plea.

Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the petitioner, argued before the bench that the plea was not against the government, instead the petitioner is seeking assistance from the government.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta opposed Dave's argument seeking issuance of notice on the plea.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Centre for Public Interest LitigationSanjay Kishan KaulSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Water Crisis: Supreme Court To Hear on Jun 3 Delhi Govt Plea Seeking Direction to Haryana To Release Surplus Water

NationalSupreme Court Refuses Cleric Maulana Kaleem Siddiqui's Plea to Enter Uttar Pradesh for Nephew's Death Anniversary

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Supreme Court Refuses Urgent Listing of Arvind Kejriwal’s Plea for Extension of Interim Bail

NationalSupreme Court Refuses Urgent Hearing of Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Seeking 7-day Extension of Interim Bail

NationalExcise Policy Scam: Arvind Kejriwal Moves Supreme Court Seeking 7-Day Extension of Interim Bail in Money Laundering Case

National Realted Stories

NationalIndia TV-CNX Exit Polls: BJP-led NDA expected to get over 400 seats

National"Today, the World is Looking Towards India": PM Modi Writes Letter After Concluding 45-Hour Meditation in Kanniyakumari

NationalHimachal records 68 per cent voting for four Lok Sabha seats, 69 per cent in six Assembly bypolls

NationalNews 18 Punjab projects 8-10 seats for Congress in Punjab

NationalExit Polls project major setbacks for Trinamool in Bengal