City
Epaper

Sessions Court upholds cost imposed on Small Industries Development Bank of India amounting to Rs 14 lakh

By ANI | Updated: July 15, 2023 20:40 IST

New Delhi [India], July 15 : A Sessions Court of Patiala House Court has upheld the cost imposed on ...

Open in App

New Delhi [India], July 15 : A Sessions Court of Patiala House Court has upheld the cost imposed on the Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI).

The complainant/revisionist, being aggrieved by the cost imposed by the Magistrate approached the Sessions Court for waiver of the cost imposed.

The Additional Sessions Judge Rajinder Singh has recently upheld the Magistrate Court order, in a cheque dishonour case wherein the magistrate imposed a cost of 1 per cent of the cheque amount which was 14 crores amounting to 14 lacs on the complainant i.e: M/s Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) was challenged before the sessions court.

The magistrate passed the order on account non-appearance of the complainant and negligence in pursuing the complaint that it had registered 6 years ago under the Negotiable Instrument Act.

The Magistrate Court being dissatisfied with the pace of judicial proceedings due to the negligence of the complainant imposed a cost of 1 per cent of the cheque amount which was 14 crores amounting to Rs 14 lakh.

Advocate Rhythm Aggarwal appeared on behalf of the respondent ie Suryavinayak industries ltd. argued on the maintainability of the application and stated that the powers of the revision cannot be exercised for interlocutory orders in terms of section 397(2)CrPC. 

Aggarwal further retreated that the impugned order is an interlocutory order as it neither decides the rights of the parties with regards to the merits of the case nor terminates the proceedings and thus cannot be set aside and relied upon a full bench supreme court judgement.

The counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the application and argued that the impugned order is not an interlocutory order without providing any explanations for the said submission. The Court found merit in Advocate Rhythm’s arguments and upheld the Magistrate’s order imposing the cost of Rs 14 lakh

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: congresspitrodadelhimodideepikabjpwest-bengaldeepika-padukoneajay-devgnthakur
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi Red Fort Car Blast: Deceased E-Rickshaw Driver’s Mother Breaks Down, Says 'I Want Justice for My Son'

NationalTarn Taran Assembly By-Election 2025: 23.05% Voter Turnout Recorded Till 11 AM in Punjab By-Poll

NationalDelhi Red Fort Car Blast: First Image of Suspected Suicide Bomber Dr Umar Muhammad Revealed

NationalDelhi Red Fort Blast: Union Home Minister Amit Shah Visits Site of Car Explosion (VIDEO)

NationalDelhi Red Fort Blast: PM Modi Condoles Loss of Lives, Reviews Situation with Amit Shah

National Realted Stories

NationalHuman-wildlife conflict: Karnataka CM asks officials to find long-term solutions

NationalVijay's TVK moves to secure common symbol for 2026 TN polls

NationalCOP30: Developing nations at risk of being left behind in green economy race, says research

NationalRed Fort, Lajpat Rai Market shut a day after blast as investigators intensify probe

NationalSeveral Maoists 'neutralised' in Bijapur-Gadhchiroli gun battle, search ops underway