City
Epaper

100 renowned Muslims oppose review of Ayodhya verdict, say keeping matter alive will not help community

By ANI | Updated: November 26, 2019 13:00 IST

Around 100 eminent Muslim personalities including Shabana Azmi and Naseeruddin Shah have opposed the move of challenging the unmous verdict of the Supreme Court in the decades-long Ayodhya dispute asserting that keeping the matter alive will not help the community.

Open in App

Around 100 eminent Muslim personalities including Shabana Azmi and Naseeruddin Shah have opposed the move of challenging the unmous verdict of the Supreme Court in the decades-long Ayodhya dispute asserting that keeping the matter alive will not help the community.

The signatories include an Islamic scholar, social activists, lawyers, journalists, businessmen, poets, actors, filmmakers, theatre personalities, musician, students and farmers.

"We, the undersigned, are deeply concerned over the decision of several of the Muslim litigants in the Ayodhya dispute to challenge the recent unmous decision of a constitution bench of the Supreme Court in favour of a Ram Temple at the disputed plot," their official statement said.

"We share the unhappiness of the Indian Muslim community, constitutional experts and secular orgsations over the fact that the highest court in the land has placed faith above law in arriving at its decision," it said.

Earlier this month, a five-judge Supreme Court bench led by then CJI Ranjan Gogoi unmously ruled in favour of Ram Lalla and said the entire disputed land spread over 2.7 acres will be handed over to a trust formed by the government, which will monitor the construction of a Ram temple at the site.

However, the signatories said they agree that the court order is "judicially flawed" but asserted that by keeping the Ayodhya dispute alive will harm, and not help, Indian Muslims

"But while agreeing that the court order is judicially flawed, we strongly believe that keeping the Ayodhya dispute alive will harm, and not help, Indian Muslims", the statement said.

"We urge fellow Muslims to ponder over what has been gained and what has been lost in the course of the over three-decades-old Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute. Has it not meant loss of previous Muslim lives and countless property on one side and the meteoric political ascendency of the sangh parivar on the other? Have we not learnt through bitter experience that in any communal conflict, it is the poor Muslim who pays the price?" it read.

( With inputs from ANI )

Tags: ayodhyaThe Supreme CourtShabana AzmiNaseeruddin Shah
Open in App

Related Stories

MaharashtraSurya Tilak Ram Navami 2026: Divine Sunbeam Illuminates Ram Lalla’s Forehead in Ayodhya (Watch Video)

LifestyleAyodhya Ram Navami 2026 Celebration Live Streaming: Watch Surya Tilak, Mangal Aarti and Other Rituals of Lord Shri Ram Janmotsav Online on March 26

LifestyleRam Navami 2026: AI-Generated Images of Lord Ram to Share on Status and with Family and Friends on Birth Anniversary

LifestyleRam Navami 2026 Celebrations in Ayodhya: From Surya Tilak to Darshan, Know Ram Mandir Timings Before Visit

NationalGas Shortage Hits Ayodhya: Ram Rasoi at Amava Temple Near Ram Mandir Suspends Meal Service

राजनीति Realted Stories

Politics"Primary duty of every citizen to vote": Puducherry Lt Governor K Kailashnathan after casting vote

PoliticsAssam elections 2026: Union Minister Sonowal cast vote in Dibrugarh, says "BJP will win around 100 seats"

PoliticsAssam records 38.9% voter turnout so far; Keralam at 33.2%, Puducherry at 37%

Politics"LDF will come back to power with more seats": Keralam Minister MB Rajesh casts his vote in Palakkad

PoliticsBaramati By-Poll To Be Held Unopposed, But Congress Is National Party So..., Says Sharad Pawar