City
Epaper

AAP slams Centre's move to bring ordinance to negate SC verdict on services

By IANS | Updated: May 20, 2023 00:05 IST

New Delhi, May 19 With the Central government brought an ordinance to negate the Supreme Court judgment placing ...

Open in App

New Delhi, May 19 With the Central government brought an ordinance to negate the Supreme Court judgment placing "services" under the control of the state government in the national capital, the ruling AAP slammed the move, and termed BJP "murderer of democracy".

Slamming the Central government, AAP Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj said, "The Centre has perpetrated fraud and treachery with the Constituion of the country and the Supreme Court order.

Minister Aatishi Marlena termed BJP "the murderer of the Constitution".

In a tweet in Hindi, she said, "BJP is the murderer of the Constitution. The Ordinance brought by the Central government is contempt of the constitutional bench of the Supreme Court. The Modi government has brought this ordinance due to the fear of giving power to the Kejriwal government.

"Arvind Kejriwal must have been elected by the people of Delhi, given more than 90 per cent seats, but he will not run Delhi, Centre will run the Delhi government."

Congress leader and noted lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi also took a jibe at the government saying it is the act of a bad, poor and graceless loser.

In a tweet, Singhvi, who had represented the Delhi government in the Supreme Court, said: "The new ordinance re NCT will have to be closely examined. But clearly, it is the act of a bad, poor and graceless loser. Doubtful if ctal principles can be diluted by ordinances or acts. Greater doubt whether parliament as a whole will at all approve it".

The Central government has brought an ordinance to set up a permanent authority known as the National Capital Civil Service Authority whose chairperson will be the Delhi Chief Minister along with the Chief Secretary, and the Principal Secretary, Home, to make recommendations to the Delhi LG regarding matters concerning transfers, postings, vigilance and other incidental matters. However, in case of difference of opinion, the decision of the LG shall be final, it provides.


aks/vd

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Aatishi marlenaaapUs Supreme CourtSaurabh BharadwajJudge Of The Supreme CourtSupreme CourtThe Supreme CourtBench Of The Supreme CourtUnited States Supreme CourtMaldives Supreme CourtWay Supreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

MumbaiDevendra Fadnavis Disagrees with Abrupt Closure of Mumbai’s Kabutarkhanas, Urges Regulated Measures to Mitigate Health Risks

MaharashtraSupreme Court Allows Sunil Shukla to Approach Bombay HC Seeking FIR Against Raj Thackeray, Derecognition of MNS Party

Mumbai2006 Mumbai Train Blasts Case: Supreme Court Stays Bombay High Court Order Acquitting 12 Accused

National"Kejriwal Has Brought Fundamental Change in Country's Politics": AAP Leader on Free Electricity In Bihar

NationalSupreme Court Asks MEA to Trace Russian Woman and Return Child's Custody To Father

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala