City
Epaper

Delhi HC junks PIL against appointment of Justice Chandrachud as CJI

By IANS | Updated: November 11, 2022 19:45 IST

New Delhi, Nov 11 The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 11 The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud.

Hearing the matter, a division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma observed that the PIL is "publicity oriented" and dismissed it after imposing a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner.

"The present petition has been filed only to gain publicity without there being any material," the bench, also comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad, observed.

Seeking a stay on the appointment of the new CJI, the petitioner argued that the appointment was "against the provisions of the Constitution".

On November 2, the Supreme Court also dismissed a similar petition seeking to restrain Justice Chandrachud from taking oath as the 50th Chief Justice of India.

Dismissing the plea, the apex court had noted that "no reason to entertain the petition" and it is "misconceived".

President Droupadi Murmu on Wednesday administered the oath of office to Justice Chandrachud as the 50th Chief Justice of India.

The ceremony, held at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, was attended by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, former Chief Justice of India U.U. Lalit, Supreme Court judges and other dignitaries.

On October 11, former Chief Justice of India U.U. Lalit named Justice Chandrachud, the senior most judge in the Supreme Court, as his successor. Justice Lalit retired on November 8.

Justice Chandrachud is the son of former Supreme Court judge Y.V. Chandrachud, who was the longest serving CJI for being in office for about seven years and four months between 1978 to 1985. During his tenure, Justice Chandrachud overturned two judgments of his father which were related to adultery and the right to privacy.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Subramonium prasadindiaNew DelhiPublic Interest LitigationThe Delhi High CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westSatish chandra sharmaIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

TechnologyHow To Effortlessly Transfer Data from Android to iPhone Using Apple’s Move to iOS App

NationalDonald Trump Imposes Additional 25% Tariff on India, Total Tariff Now 50%

NationalDelhi: 8 Accused in Vehicle Theft Cases Arrested During Police Patrolling, Stolen Scooters and Bikes Recovered

TechnologyWill the Government Have to Offer More Incentives on EVs? NITI Aayog Raises Concerns Over Slow Sales Growth

OpinionsWhy is Trump So Upset with India?

Politics Realted Stories

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray

NationalAssembly Bypoll Results 2025: AAP Wins Visavadar and Ludhiana West Seats; Congress Wrests Nilambur Seat in Kerala