City
Epaper

Delhi HC junks PIL against appointment of Justice Chandrachud as CJI

By IANS | Updated: November 11, 2022 19:45 IST

New Delhi, Nov 11 The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Nov 11 The Delhi High Court on Friday refused to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the appointment of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud.

Hearing the matter, a division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma observed that the PIL is "publicity oriented" and dismissed it after imposing a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner.

"The present petition has been filed only to gain publicity without there being any material," the bench, also comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad, observed.

Seeking a stay on the appointment of the new CJI, the petitioner argued that the appointment was "against the provisions of the Constitution".

On November 2, the Supreme Court also dismissed a similar petition seeking to restrain Justice Chandrachud from taking oath as the 50th Chief Justice of India.

Dismissing the plea, the apex court had noted that "no reason to entertain the petition" and it is "misconceived".

President Droupadi Murmu on Wednesday administered the oath of office to Justice Chandrachud as the 50th Chief Justice of India.

The ceremony, held at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, was attended by Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju, former Chief Justice of India U.U. Lalit, Supreme Court judges and other dignitaries.

On October 11, former Chief Justice of India U.U. Lalit named Justice Chandrachud, the senior most judge in the Supreme Court, as his successor. Justice Lalit retired on November 8.

Justice Chandrachud is the son of former Supreme Court judge Y.V. Chandrachud, who was the longest serving CJI for being in office for about seven years and four months between 1978 to 1985. During his tenure, Justice Chandrachud overturned two judgments of his father which were related to adultery and the right to privacy.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Subramonium prasadindiaNew DelhiPublic Interest LitigationThe Delhi High CourtThe new delhi municipal councilDelhi south-westSatish chandra sharmaIndiUk-indiaRepublic of india
Open in App

Related Stories

InternationalIranian President Calls for Constructive Role of Brics to Halt West Asia Conflict During Talks With PM Modi

LifestyleEid 2026 Date: When Will Saudi Arabia, UAE and India Celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr?

MaharashtraMaharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Unfurls 200-Foot National Flag at Nagpur’s Kasturchand Park

NationalAhmedabad Traffic Update for India vs New Zealand T20 World Cup Final: Check Road Closures and Alternate Routes Near Narendra Modi Stadium

AurangabadLocal industries feel heat of Global conflict

Politics Realted Stories

Politics"MK Stalin should be thrown out of government in this election": Palaniswami

PoliticsTVK is a "toodler party": DMK candidate KS Ravinchandran at election campaign in Pulinthope

Politics"India's foreign policy failed": Congress MP Pramod Tiwari slams 'Vishwaguru' narrative over US-Iran talks in Pakistan

PoliticsDon't turn a gentle breeze in South into a storm: MK Stalin launches fresh attack on Centre over delimitation

Politics"Pak's role in US-Iran ceasefire a severe setback for PM Modi's diplomacy": Jairam Ramesh