City
Epaper

Krishna River dispute: SC judges recuse themselves from hearing case

By IANS | Updated: January 10, 2022 23:00 IST

New Delhi, Jan 10 A Supreme Court bench on Monday recused itself from hearing a matter connected with ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Jan 10 A Supreme Court bench on Monday recused itself from hearing a matter connected with the distribution of Krishna water dispute between Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Karnataka.

A bench comprising Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and A.S. Bopanna, after the case was called out for hearing, told counsel in the matter they belonged to Maharashtra and Karnataka.

As the state governments counsel, involved in the matter, contended that they have no objection to the bench hearing the case, the judges said that earlier Supreme Court judges Justice A.M. Khanwilkar and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar had recused themselves from the matter due to similar reasons. "We don't want ourselves to be the target of invectives," said the bench.

The bench further added that it is better that this case is taken up for hearing by a different combination of judges. Now, the matter will go before the Chief Justice N.V. Ramana, to assign it to some other combination of judges.

The Andhra Pradesh government had earlier claimed that the Telangana government is depriving it of its legitimate share of water for drinking and irrigation purposesand this is "unconstitutional and illegal".

Andhra Pradesh, in its plea, submitted that Telangana is refusing to follow decisions taken in the apex council constituted under the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014, directions of Krishna River Management Board (KRMB) constituted under this Act, and directions of the Centre.

The plea cited that under Section 87(1), the board can exercise jurisdiction only in respect of such aspects as are notified by the Centre, but no such notification has been issued so far.

The plea argued that in view of no progress on notification of the jurisdiction of KRMB, Telangana by its acts of commission is seriously affecting the water supply to Andhra Pradesh for irrigation and other purposes.

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Supreme CourtKrishna river management board
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalUnnao Rape Case: 'I Have Faith in SC,' Says Survivor After CBI Moves Apex Court

NationalPregnant Sunali Khatoon and Her Son, Deported as Bangladeshis, to Be Brought Back to India, Centre Tells Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump by 2% As Government Reviews AGR Relief Proposal

NationalSupreme Court Orders Nationwide Digital Arrest Cases to Be Transferred to CBI

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Stocks Fall After SC Issues Notice on Plea for Probe Into Alleged ADAG Bank Fraud

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiWho Is Tejasvee Ghosalkar? Shiv Sena UBT Leader and Former Corporator Joins BJP Ahead of BMC Polls

MaharashtraSanjay Raut Says Sena–MNS Already Together No Need Others Permission

MaharashtraBig Jolt to Sharad Pawar as Salil Deshmukh, Son of Anil Deshmukh, Quits NCP-SP

PoliticsEknath Shinde Issues Strict No-Crossover Order After Meeting Amit Shah; Directive Communicated to All Shiv Sena Leaders

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days