City
Epaper

Right to contest election neither fundamental, nor common law right: SC

By IANS | Updated: September 13, 2022 17:35 IST

New Delhi, Sep 13 The Supreme Court has observed that the right to contest an election is neither ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Sep 13 The Supreme Court has observed that the right to contest an election is neither a fundamental right nor a common law right and imposed Rs 1 lakh cost on a litigant who sought to contest Rajya Sabha polls without a proposer to propose his name.

A bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia said: "An individual cannot claim that he has a right to contest election and the said stipulation violates his fundamental right, so as to file his nomination without any proposer as is required under the Act."

The top court noted that petitioner Vishwanath Pratap Singh filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court raising a grievance that a notification for election to Rajya Sabha was issued on May 12, to fill up the seats of members retiring from June 21 to August 1, and the last date for submission of the nomination was May 31.

"The stand of the petitioner is that he collected the nomination form but was not allowed to file his nomination without a proper proposer proposing his name. The petitioner sought his candidature without proposer which was not accepted and, therefore, he claims that his fundamental right of free speech and expression and right to personal liberty has been infringed."

Citing a judgment of Rajbala vs State of Haryana (2016), the bench said this court held that the right to contest for a seat in either of the two bodies is subject to certain constitutional restrictions and could be restricted further only by a law made by the Parliament.

Thus, the petitioner did not have any right to contest election to the Rajya Sabha in terms of the law made by the Parliament, it said, adding that the Representation of People Act, 1950 read with the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961 has contemplated the name of a candidate to be proposed while filling the nomination form.

"We find that the writ petition before the High Court was entirely misconceived and so is the present special leave petition. The right to contest an election is neither a fundamental right nor a common law right. It is a right conferred by a statute," the court said.

In the order passed on September 9, the top court said, "We dismiss the present special leave petition with cost of Rs 1,00,000. The said cost be paid to the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee within four weeks. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of."

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Delhi High CourtSupreme CourtSudhanshu DhuliaHemant guptaDelhi delhi high courtSeveral supreme courtU.k. high court`delhi high court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalDelhi High Court Directs Social Media Intermediaries to Take Action Within 7 Days on Pawan Kalyan’s Personality Rights Plea

NationalPregnant Sunali Khatoon and Her Son, Deported as Bangladeshis, to Be Brought Back to India, Centre Tells Supreme Court

BusinessVodafone Idea Shares Jump by 2% As Government Reviews AGR Relief Proposal

NationalSupreme Court Orders Nationwide Digital Arrest Cases to Be Transferred to CBI

BusinessAnil Ambani's Reliance Power and Reliance Infra Stocks Fall After SC Issues Notice on Plea for Probe Into Alleged ADAG Bank Fraud

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiWho Is Tejasvee Ghosalkar? Shiv Sena UBT Leader and Former Corporator Joins BJP Ahead of BMC Polls

MaharashtraSanjay Raut Says Sena–MNS Already Together No Need Others Permission

MaharashtraBig Jolt to Sharad Pawar as Salil Deshmukh, Son of Anil Deshmukh, Quits NCP-SP

PoliticsEknath Shinde Issues Strict No-Crossover Order After Meeting Amit Shah; Directive Communicated to All Shiv Sena Leaders

MaharashtraBMC Elections 2025: Devendra Fadnavis Says Clarity on Seat-Sharing Will Emerge in Two Days