City
Epaper

SC dismisses appeal by BJP candidate in Karnataka's RR seat

By IANS | Published: October 13, 2020 11:04 PM

New Delhi, Oct 13 The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea by BJP's Muniraju Gowda, the candidate ...

Open in App

New Delhi, Oct 13 The Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea by BJP's Muniraju Gowda, the candidate from R.R. Nagar constituency in the 2018 Karnataka Assembly polls, challenging the High Court order declining to entertain his plea to declare him elected him against the backdrop of corrupt practices adopted by winning Congress candidate.

A bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian, said: "Once it is found that neither the original election petition nor the amended election petition contains any pleading of material facts which would enable the High Court to form an opinion in terms of Section 101, there was no alternative for the High Court but to strike off prayer for declaring him winner."

Bypoll is due in the constituency on November 3, as Sri Munirathna was disqualified in November 2019, following his resignation in July 2019. Later, he joined the BJP.

The counsel for Gowda contended that due to the disqualification of Munirathna, the BJP candidate can seek to be declared as the winner.

However, the bench observed that there is one more reason why the petitioner cannot succeed: in the elections in question, there were 14 candidates in the fray, including the petitioner herein and the first respondent (Munirathna).

The top court noted that Gowda secured 82,572 votes, while Munirathna was declared to have secured 1,08,064 votes. "Therefore, in terms of Section 101 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, the election petitioner should satisfy: that he received a majority of the valid votes; or (ii) that but for the votes obtained by the returned candidate by corrupt practices, he would have obtained a majority of the valid votes."

The High Court had dismissed Gowda's plea to bring in additional material facts in support of his plea, as he had moved the plea after lapse of 18 months. The top court this is also barred by limitation. "In view of the above, the Order of the High Court does not call for any interference. Hence these Special Leave Petitions are dismissed," it said.

( With inputs from IANS )

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: bjpSupreme Court
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024 Phase 3: Only 123 Women Among 1,352 Candidates; 18% Have Criminal Cases, Says ADR Report

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024: BJP Receives Five Consecutive Votes in Assam? ECI Fact-Checks Viral Video, Clarifies Misinformation

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSreenivasa Prasad Dies: Former Union Minister Passes Away at 76 After Prolonged Illness

Politics Realted Stories

NationalPM Modi Lies About Muslims Having More Children, Fertility Rate Declined in the Community, Says Asaduddin Owaisi (Watch Video)

MaharashtraDevendra Fadnavis Refutes Uddhav Thackeray's Claims: 'He Might Be Hallucinating'

MaharashtraSunetra Pawar Files Nomination Papers For Baramati Seat; Here's Why Ajit Pawar Was Not Present

NationalRam Navami Processions in West Bengal Will Proceed with Full Reverence and Devotion, Says PM Modi (Watch)

PoliticsEvery Vote Given To The Congress in the LS election Would Be a Vote for Economic Bankruptcy, Corruption, and Insecurity in the Country”: BS Yediyurappa