City
Epaper

SC notice on fresh pleas challenging CAA, tags them with other pleas

By IANS | Published: May 20, 2020 9:13 PM

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on five fresh petitions challenging the constitutional validity of ...

Open in App

The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to the Centre on five fresh petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 (CAA), citing specific exclusion of Muslims was against the principle of secularism under the Constitution, and the right to equality.

Notified on January 10, the CAA seeks to grantIndian citizenship to non-Muslims minorities Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christ, who have migrated from Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan till December 31, 2014, after facing faith-based persecution.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and comprising Justices A.S. Bopanna and Hrishikesh Roy, taking up the matter through video-conferencing, issued the notice on the pleas filed by All Assam Law Students Union, Tamil Nadu Thoweed Jamath, Shalim, Muslim Students Federation (Assam) and Sachin Yadav.

The apex court also ordered their tagging with the other PILs filed on the matter.

The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) is the lead petitioner, and in December last year, the top court had said it will examine the constitutional validity of the CAA, but refused to stay the operation of the law. Nearly 160 pleas have been filed opposing the CAA.

One of the pleas said it was raising important questions in connection with the promulgation of the CAA, where for the first time, religion has been introduced as a condition for acquisition of Indian citizenship for undocumented migrants from the three neighboring countries.

The pleas argued that the classification based on the religious identity of the individual is against the fundamental principle of secularism, which is an integral component of the Constitution.

The pleas have argued that citizenship is being extended to a certain class of migrants, and this violates Article 14 (right to equality) and 21 (right to equality) of the Constitution. The IUML had argued that CAA violates the fundamental right to equality and intends to grant citizenship to a section of illegal immigrants by making exclusion on the basis of religion.

( With inputs from IANS )

Tags: Supreme CourtCAASachin YadavHrishikesh Roy
Open in App

Related Stories

NationalCovishield Vaccine Side Effects: Plea Filed in Supreme Court To Examine Adverse Effects of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 Vaccine

NationalReview Petitions Against Supreme Court's Decision Upholding Article 370 Abrogation Listed for Hearing On May 1st

NationalDelhi Excise Policy Case: Why No Bail Plea in Trial Court, Supreme Court Asks CM Arvind Kejriwal

NationalSupreme Court Denies Request to Delay CA Exams Amid Lok Sabha Election 2024

National“Not a Single Rupee Was Traced Back to AAP”: CM Arvind Kejriwal Files Response on ED’s Affidavit in Supreme Court

Politics Realted Stories

PoliticsRahul Gandhi's Nomination For Lok Sabha Polls Likely To Be From Raebareli

PoliticsMaharashtra Lok Sabha Elections 2024: BJP Fields Hemant Savara as Its Candidate from Palghar

PoliticsFormer Maharashtra Minister Ganesh Naik’s Supporters Resigns As Mahayuti Announces Shiv Sena Candidate for Thane Lok Sabha Seat

PoliticsOdisha Assembly Election 2024: BJP Releases List of Candidates for Six Constituencies

NationalLok Sabha Election 2024: EC Issues Advisory to Parties, Says Don’t Register ‘Beneficiaries’ for Future Schemes