City
Epaper

UK's Rwanda asylum plan lawful: Court

By IANS | Updated: December 20, 2022 11:10 IST

London, Dec 20 A British court has ruled that the government's plan to send asylum-seekers on a one-way ...

Open in App

London, Dec 20 A British court has ruled that the government's plan to send asylum-seekers on a one-way trip to Rwanda is lawful, but they also criticised it for failing to properly assess the circumstances of the eight individuals it tried to move under the scheme earlier this year.

"The court has concluded that it is lawful for the government to make arrangements for relocating asylum seekers to Rwanda and for their asylum claims to be determined in Rwanda rather than in the UK," Xinhua news agency quoted Lord Justice Clive Lewis as saying in Monday's ruling.

"On the evidence before this court, the Government has made arrangements with the government of Rwanda, which are intended to ensure that the asylum claims of people relocated to Rwanda are properly determined in Rwanda," he said.

The UK reached a deal with Rwanda in April, under which illegal immigrants and asylum seekers are to be sent to the east African country to have their claims processed there.

If successful, they would be granted permanent residency in Rwanda rather than allowed to return to the UK.

The UK hopes that the deal, for which it paid Rwanda 120 million pounds ($146 million) upfront, will help deter migrants from making the perilous journey across the English Channel in small boats.

More than 44,000 migrants, a record high number, have arrived in the UK across the Channel this year.

The first flight scheduled to take the migrants to Rwanda in June was cancelled after a last-minute intervention by the European Court of Human Rights.

The court ruled that one of the migrants would face "a real risk of irreversible harm" if sent to Rwanda.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman tweeted: "We have always maintained that this policy is lawful and today the court has upheld this."

A spokeswoman of the Rwandan government welcomed the High Court's decision, saying: "This is a positive step in our quest to contribute innovative, long-term solutions to the global migration crisis."

Reacting to the ruling, Yvette Cooper, shadow home secretary of the main opposition Labour Party, described the UK government's Rwanda asylum policy as "unworkable, unethical, extortionately expensive".

Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor

Tags: Suella BravermanLondonXinhuaRwandaClive LewisPremier of saAdministrative capitalRegistrar courtEuropean court of human rightsAihmSuella fernandes braverman
Open in App

Related Stories

PuneNilesh Ghaywal, Pune Gangster and Accused in Kothrud Firing Case, Flees to London

BusinessTata Motors Shares Fall After JLR Faces ₹20,000 Crore Cyberattack Erasing FY25 Profits

NationalUnlocking India’s Tourism Potential: Challenges and Opportunities

InternationalDonald Trump Says London Mayor Sadiq Khan Among 'Worst' in World, Claims He Blocked Him from Royal Banquet

EntertainmentAnoushka Shankar and Arijit Singh Team Up for a Special Performance in London, Sitarist Says ‘There’s more to come’

Politics Realted Stories

MumbaiAmeet Satam Appointed As Mumbai BJP President Ahead of BMC Polls

Maharashtra'Chaddi Baniyan' Protest at Maharashtra Assembly: Opposition Stages Agitation Against Sena MLA for Punching and Slapping Canteen Staff (Watch Video)

MaharashtraMaharashtra Monsoon Session: Ajit Pawar Slams Bhaskar Jadhav Over Fund Allegations, Says 'No Need for Unsolicited Advice'

MumbaiUddhav Thackeray Pats Raj Thackeray on Back at Victory Rally Speech; Emotional Video of Thackeray Brothers Goes Viral

MaharashtraMarathi Language Controversy: ‘Did I Pass a GR Against Brotherhood?’ Devendra Fadnavis Hits Back at Uddhav & Raj Thackeray